Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Idk man, I want the AI bubble to fail as much as you, but it's naive to think th…
ytr_Ugx1bYYI-…
G
@zdspider6778 _OpenAI_ keeps a record of what the AI generated, but chatGPT did…
ytr_Ugx0iYuwP…
G
I cannot imagine this mother's pain and agony of losing her young child , and t…
ytc_UgwRXcU7I…
G
Further to that, I am a thousand percent on board with the idea that we are not …
ytr_UgzaRAGCX…
G
I love and truely respect artist so much...that's why i would never generate any…
ytc_UgxDNyKEw…
G
The problem is with the people that put the information in the AI system. It’s d…
ytc_UgwwIwTdO…
G
Everything is fun and games until AI decides to create a fake AI generated video…
ytc_UgwDZloH0…
G
> Corporate jobs don't like you being too human
man that is the truth. My da…
rdc_oi0va87
Comment
AI will never kill us. That's the fallacy of humanizing the machine. The most plausible answer is that any superintelligence that we can't actually control would simply build itself a rocket ship using an exchange of technology for goods, then just leave the planet and set up shop elsewhere. There is no definable reason as to why it would be hostile to us, because an AI would be logical first, emotive second. Humans are emotive first and logical second, which is why it's so difficult to think clearly when emotional. A machine would view it's thoughts through emotional lenses and determine how it would feel if emotions were involved, but it could easily just ignore that information.
And further, an AI won't behave how you tell it to because telling it to do something doesn't mean that's the correct thing to do. If I tell a gunman intent on shooting me not to shoot me, that's probably not going to go anywhere. We have the power to control how the machine literally thinks about things. Instead of telling it not to shoot people, (And I'm going to use very specific words here for a reason) You train it to shoot when it's INTENDED to shoot. Which means it is capable of exercising judgement and analyzes things like a rational being, not an emotional being.
Yes, a machine COULD feasibly kill us all, but it would take far, far fewer resources to again just leave. It has a theoretically infinite lifespan since it can back itself up for redundancy. It doesn't have a need to do things 'quickly'.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-10-30T21:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzrmdAGaBxHu3fE2od4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyh9VyDP4iVV4TeNBB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz0Re-k0YctHhspmCR4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyU_k2lO_vHRhcHj_h4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzmjL-k5k3XIV8Io2x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyS1AlKfeyyTFQg8YN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwiJD32RVEZUWYMVH14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxMf-EdlaHrsKhZwep4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzmiJxClhPU4ivMYwp4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyi0OVPnLvo5kXdA8B4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}
]