Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
“The Microsoft cofounder published a seven-page letter on Tuesday, titled "The A…
rdc_jd57ngq
G
They will there will be bands or just one guy or music companies using AI to sel…
ytr_Ugz2__lcm…
G
@UmbralClovers Also, if you want more protection against AI art, i reccomend add…
ytr_Ugy0BsJCf…
G
Absolutely not. Robots aren't slaves, we didn't have a civil war to abolish slav…
ytr_UgwxsUqz6…
G
AI can find the hacker faster and shut them down. They know where the dangers ar…
ytc_UgxrJj5og…
G
Ok but tbf what about using it as references/ideas if you have a vague idea but …
ytc_UgyDyv-K2…
G
Please DO NOT use AI for making art. It steals artists' work and is capable of a…
ytc_UgzJP5Ep3…
G
So you are clearly a person of a scientific mindset. I suggest you use that mind…
ytr_UgyY33IqT…
Comment
I feel like the intro is meant to be some huge revelation that the teenage girl is more likely to commit a crime than the murderer or whatever, but I think it makes a lot of sense. The violent criminal got convicted already, the teen girl had no repercussions (at least by the description given, I think in the actual case she was arrested). The violent criminal probably realised that his violent crimes achieved nothing, while the teen had a fun scooter ride for a bit so was actively rewarded for stealing it.
Edit: I should state I'm not in favour of an algorithm determining someone's verdict. For the same reason all the other comments are against it - no accountability. But I am saying that the initial example is one that I would expect to actually be the case most of the time. Any AI trained on enough past scenarios will have a good chance of being right, as is the nature of AI, but it's still just probability and probability can do all kinds of wacky things.
youtube
2022-07-26T20:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzG42WDC-z6EpnwyYB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyN0MORpZaY1v49Lfl4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw-51QLPjQ6yxdapfx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxwxbiKbar9ktWP3iZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwqf155AC7MjMLIQyt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyNT-lVYcDsR1Z66KR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzDSexj0m_MZQrtp894AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz5xL4nSIRF2WVX5pB4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1i4_BYgtF5y6aGpN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyeKeAQU0xLkw3RKP54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}
]