Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
By implementing logical rules and conditions, AI could have acted as an automated watchdog: 1. Preventative Controls: • If a transaction exceeds a certain threshold, then it requires dual approval. • When an approval chain is bypassed, flag it for review. • How does this compare to normal transaction patterns? 2. Detection & Investigation: • If a pattern of suspicious transactions emerges, • Then trace them back to the decision-makers, • When inconsistencies appear, cross-check supporting documentation, • How does this align with past fraudulent cases? By embedding these logic-based safeguards, AI could have eliminated loopholes before they were exploited. But even with strict rules, human manipulation can still find ways around them. From your experience with DOGE, would AI have been enough to stop fraud entirely, or would people always find creative ways to circumvent the system?
youtube AI Governance 2025-10-03T10:2…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitydeveloper
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policyregulate
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgxxQYlsZymChyVw19t4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzKz_7QdsMw_OfnPGR4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyLxljpKEfbwm3B5gt4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzieOth2nDrY3_b2DR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyKftSaUAOWRJ0fmXJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyI2fuvUomiOXgKtvV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxYqsltqBFOq5ZfVwB4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyoLefoh89ONUBz1Kd4AaABAg","responsibility":"creator","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyNPWXW_pBeF9NibBF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyOCJg43TEcZa_mkR54AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"} ]