Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G While all that is bad, this video does not show ANY statistics on acciadents per… ytc_Ugx77lh1a… G It's not about what it can do at this moment. It's about where the technology wi… ytr_UgxtlcjRl… G like even the real estate company my dad works in is using ai. like why is ts ha… ytc_Ugxmz21LA… G If we are in movie 🎬 iam sure a james bond type will destroy it. Its only a comp… ytc_UgylTqFfD… G Lots of opinions with no justification here and there, and authority arguments. … ytc_UgyVTMF_y… G The problem is pursuit of wealth, grandiosity and control. Effectively the prin… ytc_UgxHgM0sU… G The reason A.I art can never replace people is A.I is only cabable of following … ytc_Ugx9l_0j1… G NO TO FACIAL RECOGNITION, THIS IS IDENTITY THEFT, THE RULE OF LAW IS UPHELD, UPH… ytc_UgxrTgv_f…
Comment
The judge issued an incorrect verdict (on 2:50), equating human learning and the "learning" of language models. Mathematical models "do not understand" what is written, they save the texts of books very accurately and can reproduce them accurately. In fact, this is: write information to a "database" and then extract it using a search query (promt). The way information is stored in this "database" does not matter. Otherwise, you can call a zip archive a "serious transformation" and on this basis allow pirated books, music, etc. by simply allowing their archiving "for transformation". Therefore, this 1.5 billion is not enough. The "AI giants" should not pay for a one-time "reading" of a book in the process of "learning" mathematical models, they should pay for copyright infringement, for storing in their "databases" someone else's content that can be extracted and accurately reproduced (in fact, this is permitted plagiarism). The judge must have been bribed or misled about the "reasonableness of AI."
youtube AI Responsibility 2026-01-12T21:3…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningdeontological
Policynone
Emotionmixed
Coded at2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgyKa6BENTDKQsNJmFN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyfsB2mjStPCaGYYAd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzwQl7iEoV9KC1YI3F4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwB5-4kw7Ftdf2UkJF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyBwQFxCGhzgamhF054AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyeCExOvKOs2IJk2L14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyKHWjaHzDiYM9Xoqh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyzGeb-orB3ZOFUoHV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx0DGcaYiSJ6DZjt754AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzhGDgyQq8hgV8omO14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"} ]