Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This might sound harsh, but the reality is AI didn't actually take our jobs. It …
ytc_UgzldyMkw…
G
If an AI made the most beautiful and well written movie ever created, it would s…
ytc_UgzLq5e0G…
G
Pumped up cheekbones and lips are not attractive! This is an epidemic in the 21s…
ytc_Ugy4k9jXq…
G
People are just mad they dont want to put the time and effort into learning how …
ytc_Ugyfj0dNC…
G
Then I have good news for you: You don't have to! Because Hoyo didn't do this!
T…
ytr_UgwYL3JbH…
G
AI reasons at PHD graduate level. AI can't be relied on to order a pizza. What g…
ytc_UgwEs8bW-…
G
I very much welcome AI music once it reaches the level where it can at will prod…
ytc_UgwLbaRz9…
G
I work in insurance where human input is quite needed when you are dealing with …
ytc_UgwAjLX26…
Comment
The judge issued an incorrect verdict (on 2:50), equating human learning and the "learning" of language models. Mathematical models "do not understand" what is written, they save the texts of books very accurately and can reproduce them accurately. In fact, this is: write information to a "database" and then extract it using a search query (promt). The way information is stored in this "database" does not matter. Otherwise, you can call a zip archive a "serious transformation" and on this basis allow pirated books, music, etc. by simply allowing their archiving "for transformation". Therefore, this 1.5 billion is not enough. The "AI giants" should not pay for a one-time "reading" of a book in the process of "learning" mathematical models, they should pay for copyright infringement, for storing in their "databases" someone else's content that can be extracted and accurately reproduced (in fact, this is permitted plagiarism). The judge must have been bribed or misled about the "reasonableness of AI."
youtube
AI Responsibility
2026-01-12T21:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyKa6BENTDKQsNJmFN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyfsB2mjStPCaGYYAd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzwQl7iEoV9KC1YI3F4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwB5-4kw7Ftdf2UkJF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyBwQFxCGhzgamhF054AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyeCExOvKOs2IJk2L14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyKHWjaHzDiYM9Xoqh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyzGeb-orB3ZOFUoHV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0DGcaYiSJ6DZjt754AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzhGDgyQq8hgV8omO14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}
]