Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
AI developments and tools utilisation are chaotic why? People are cover by an e…
ytc_UgyYQHs72…
G
A world with a creator, I can agree with that. A dominant being was produced to …
ytc_UgyjyK4d2…
G
What heavyweights? What touting? The only people I see repeating this nonsense a…
rdc_nmavluv
G
I'm putting this out there because I've seen firsthand how powerful AI can be fo…
ytc_UgyvgeWLe…
G
2:43 i don't agree with the ai dude, but idk how that person selling random ai p…
ytc_UgwiFCiiD…
G
Think about how many sickos will mutate it pretending it’s real . Till finally h…
ytc_UgxuYbsjs…
G
Ask your guest: AI is alien intelligence? Right not artificial ? ! The lack of …
ytc_UgwnJ4xRk…
G
e..e and this is why I hate humanity right now, calling an ai that has ZERO cons…
ytc_UgzbNzJq2…
Comment
Taylor, it's almost entirely black n brown people trying to point out how they feel like there's a racist component, and entirely white people dismissing it. Idk, look at my pic, I'm snow white, but I think we need to read the room on this one.
do people really view big tech as literally just their physical devices? big pharma is not physical pills, it's companies, it's people. nobody seems confused about the 2nd case.
Also, if it is conceivable that future AI systems achieve some sort of consciousness, then it is conceivable that it will need rights. The argument about people still needing rights is of course persuasive, but looking at it realistically, the same programmers, techs, and researchers who would be engaged in this AI research are not at all likely to have otherwise been engaged with the expansion of human rights. Having them maintain operations within their area of expertise may well be the best thing we could have them do. Already, they seem like people amenable to voting in favor of human rights, i think these are allies.
youtube
2025-09-17T14:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugz9nlp62XMqCp8ZnA54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzxBkKXJI2Zr2zgcZp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyHMjaK13V0m6os-t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyJaq_EA25Q7tQn1VB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxSMbN412O9ueN_Deh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"confusion"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyb77qYlni84-HhcuJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyvtH7Ecq8KssRLq2d4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxG8ib8XEA_QLYFty54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjrwERo3OTfdQcBb14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyH71CzFJs9P46SRhd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]