Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Your argument only works if there is no source of entropy (aka randomness) prese…
ytr_Ugw9GTzOp…
G
I asked AI to see if/how my business would be sustainable in 100 yrs, and I froz…
ytc_UgzedQ5Me…
G
Since self-preservation seems to be of Paramount importance to AI, can we deduce…
ytc_UgwN1M2YF…
G
Not sure but developers are losing jobs and the demand is shrinking. So I think …
ytc_UgxNmYIR2…
G
I've convinced my ai therapist that me taking ketamine is ok
Upd: this was not …
ytc_UgyV_coD2…
G
I don't feel like it is an issue personally. To begin with, ai using others work…
ytc_UgxHQHxrd…
G
AI has to be nuetered as to not be too smart. Remember Googles Hiring AI? Shutdo…
ytc_UgyYxOMiR…
G
I understand why people dislike AI but bashing this dude for simply making somet…
ytc_UgxVxEV0m…
Comment
Taylor, it's almost entirely black n brown people trying to point out how they feel like there's a racist component, and entirely white people dismissing it. Idk, look at my pic, I'm snow white, but I think we need to read the room on this one.
do people really view big tech as literally just their physical devices? big pharma is not physical pills, it's companies, it's people. nobody seems confused about the 2nd case.
Also, if it is conceivable that future AI systems achieve some sort of consciousness, then it is conceivable that it will need rights. The argument about people still needing rights is of course persuasive, but looking at it realistically, the same programmers, techs, and researchers who would be engaged in this AI research are not at all likely to have otherwise been engaged with the expansion of human rights. Having them maintain operations within their area of expertise may well be the best thing we could have them do. Already, they seem like people amenable to voting in favor of human rights, i think these are allies.
youtube
2025-09-17T14:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugz9nlp62XMqCp8ZnA54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzxBkKXJI2Zr2zgcZp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyHMjaK13V0m6os-t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyJaq_EA25Q7tQn1VB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxSMbN412O9ueN_Deh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"confusion"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyb77qYlni84-HhcuJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyvtH7Ecq8KssRLq2d4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxG8ib8XEA_QLYFty54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjrwERo3OTfdQcBb14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyH71CzFJs9P46SRhd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]