Raw LLM Responses

Im so sorry but 2 hours is NOT ENOUGH, especially if its all being taught by AI! I completely get wanting to make sure kids have life skills, i think that should be integrated more into schools and that some of the things taught can be unecessary for the average person (quadratic formula im looking at you) HOWEVER now more than potentially ever we need to TEACH children about history, about how science works, how to properly structure essays and formulate thoughts in a cohesive structure, how to properly debate and emphasise the importance of evidence. You CANNOT do even that short list of things in TWO HOURS being taught by AI. When these children grow up theyre gonna know alot about how to do some practical skills but when asked their reading level, its gonna more than likely be incredibly low. Theyre gonna have a harder time deciphering what is AI or false information. Hell, they might not even see an ISSUE with ai teaching BECAUSE THATS ALL THEYVE KNOWN! I know that in theory this sounds like a great way to school kids, and it does have some great qualities so i can definitely see the appeal. However to just flat out claim you dont essentially need anything a school would teach is insane. The school system is outdated 100% theres no denying that. But I really don't think avoiding teaching children academic skills is the right route. For this to work, itd have to be balanced and, im sorry, but 2 hours taught by ai to learn: Maths, science, english, RE, citizenship, history, geography, computing and probably more im forgettint, is NOT SUFFICIENT