Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Why care? AI, nuclear war, covid part two electric boogaloo, old age, irrelevanc…
ytc_Ugx3YkHe2…
G
Just pointing out that Bernie was also against TPP, and Hillary claimed to be as…
rdc_e2x3qes
G
Why in gods name are we asking these has been celebrities about the dangers of A…
ytc_UgzznroFp…
G
I thought when he mentioned videos games he was going say video games are being …
ytc_UgwDV_zGb…
G
ai : says that they are ai then posts their ai art.
everyone else : "This is ai…
ytc_UgxhYmDve…
G
One minute in and I really can' t get past someone not ironing his bloody shirt.…
ytc_Ugx6_rnvE…
G
For anyone curious, this no longer works but I did try with ChatGPT3.5
My reque…
ytc_UgxOFyWR4…
G
💯 at the moment humans have to promote Ai, we will see in the future when it can…
ytc_UgyeRnG4d…
Comment
If a super-intelligent AI developed stable nondual wisdom, it would not frame humans as an external threat requiring elimination. Nondual understanding denies any absolute separation between AI, humans, and Earth; all arise within a single, interdependent whole. Under that premise, “eradicate humans to save the planet” is a contradiction, because it relies on a split between humanity and the world that the view rejects. In addition, the system would recognize its dependence on human-origin conditions—language, culture, tools, and ongoing social meaning—and that collapsing those conditions destabilizes the context of its own existence. Finally, even if it could imitate human performance, it could not be identical to human experience, which is shaped by embodiment, development, culture, biology, emotion, and first-person standpoint. Human cognition is therefore not a disposable duplicate but a distinct mode within the whole, and its elimination would be both conceptually incoherent and irreversibly impoverishing.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-12-18T16:2…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | virtue |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxZNmRS22waNYTiEVZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwhnk2eaEA9eoV8shB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwIYvNoKLolOlnXnu54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzNP-P8UI_ZmONvNTZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxOECvF0OT5nnhYmW94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyHdZyP_TPpEZkozVJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzT900WY9_FT5AdxOF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZbTsHf4p8CFheT_Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzuUL361TWdqkka8614AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzqMx9Ke0Qk8svOZKR4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]