Raw LLM Responses

He sound stupid. His knowledge is just limited to programming and maybe some that can be SEARCHED online. However, knowing something by simply reading it, is not pure knowledge. It is just MEMORIZING what you've read. His examples are so poor, like super stupid examples provided by a moron. Why compare human brain to a dog's brain. The capacity of human brain to imagine and realize things are endless. While the dog takes years to learn a trick or two. He is STUPID STUPID STUPID. It scares me to think that people like him is incharge of A.I. safety. It would be the worst safety measures humanity could ever have. Also, only a moron would say that 99% of jobs will be replaced by an A.I. Most people won't depend most of the food they intake to A.I. The exact taste of whatever food a person likes can't be replicated by an A.I. especially if there are specifics that your tongue and palette is looking for. Another job is for humans to take care of animals and nature. A.I. will never have emotions, therefore cats, dogs, and any animals that needs care won't allow them to be fur parents. Alterations or changes in animal's behavior is needed for A.I to CONTROL it, not to CARE for it. It is unethical. How much more to humans. It would defeat free will. Data analytics will never ever be replacing human's free will. Future foresight using collected data is always uncertain. A.I will never understand human brain. It will just remain as a tool. What can make the A.I dangerous is if bad human beings make it bad. The threat is not A.I. the real threat are humans who have dangerous thinking like this stupid man being interviewed. Scary, but it is the truth.