Raw LLM Responses

This argument is flawed for sure. But if pottery is art, like so many ancient cultures believed it was, and of course many today believe as well. What happened to the potter's is what will happen to the current day artists as long as the technology can reach a point to become comparable. If it doesn't and AI art is missing something actually measurable in comparison. That like modern day hand pottery masters. Artists will be left behind compared to their former glory. They will be able to fill a niche, but likely not the whole. They will likely still damand a lot of respect for thier craft, but be as popular in industrial and promotional work. I still believe they will have a place. But this is more a judgement on what has occurred with every other subject of mechanized production. Rsther than a comment on what should occur. Although I see nothing wrong with the merit of these machines taking precident over the merit of human art. Who's is better is all that matters. Better meaning different things for different use cases. Maybe faster is better for some, or more intricate for others, maybe even human for a niche of people. It's fine. Let the free market stay free. Special interest are for socialists, read Weath of Nations by Adam Smith to find out more.