Raw LLM Responses

28:35 That is simply wrong - at least if you only apply it to AI. If recombination of basic building blocks isn't something new, then there simply is nothing new, regardless of it being made by a human or AI. Every human is influenced and molded by what they have seen and experienced before, there can never be an original style, because that style is by definition created through the creator's earlier experiences and thus not original. Van Gogh learned to draw and paint from others and created his own works using that basis - by your definition he stole from his teachers. All throughout the video , but specifically here 1:19:44 You can't steal information. An AI training on the picture someone drew (or a person looking at a picture someone drew) is neither taking that picture away, nor magically removing the creator's skills or expertise from their head. An AI is no more "stealing an opportunity" from an artist than someone who taught themselves to draw by looking at said artist's pictures. 1:20:34 That's the same as arguing that fashion will end because clothes are no longer artisanally made. 1:21:51 "This isn't a recipe that benefits society it does not benefit the textile workers with the actual weaving skills. It's one where talentless hacks (industrialists) try to steal money and opportunities that would have otherwise gone rightfully gone to those textile workers to continue practicing their actual skills. Instead of people seeing actual talent, they see someone who prompted a derivative version from an actual textile worker's work. [...] Why would anyone spend the time and effort to learn how to weave real clothing, when you can just use the automatic loom and pretend that's somehow the same thing as inspired manual work?" I'm not defending Shadiversity calling himself an artist for using AI - or defending anything he says on any topic for that matter - using AI makes you no more of an artist than having another human draw a picture for you; but this video seems to mostly be made up of either malding at having your profession automated or highly emotional appeals to nature and genetic fallacies.