Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I've been on pixiv and they have tags to indicate AI generated art, specifically…
ytc_UgyTbspsq…
G
I disagree in some parts. First, the speed. As usual, getting the 80% is a lot m…
ytc_UgwywsAts…
G
@LOL-bu5nv-2 I'm not reading that. If you think that a generative learning algor…
ytr_UgyP9mJRP…
G
That’s not open ai chat got, it’s a different company, one with no track record…
ytc_Ugw9n2XjW…
G
Its a scary situation. Lets hope that mankind will be alert and regulate AI befo…
ytc_UgxwdHKDd…
G
artists WANT to create. they're artists because of that. what they're complainin…
ytr_UgyAHvO7k…
G
@michael2350 Exactly. I'm less likely to continue to do business with a company…
ytr_UgwiOBJIG…
G
I REALLY SORRY I PROMISE MY BROTHER TEXTED A FREAKY ASSTRO AI BOT AND MADE A BAB…
ytc_Ugxeo3_c0…
Comment
I theorize that as long as there is more than 1 LLM "AI," there will not be an LLM-based superintelligence.
The reason for this is that LLMs put out an absolute ton of absolute garbage data that will one way or another get fed into the other LLM(s), causing that LLM's data to be more worthless, whose data will be fed back to the other LLM... it'll be a loop of spam and white noise garbage at one another that will just get more and more senseless over time.
Conversely a single LLM could theoretically consistently be updated with actual real human data, even though some human data is also garbage and spam. Perhaps a sufficiently powerful LLM could recognize the trolls, spam, and lies by pooling together an entire world of human-sourced information and data. I doubt that even a single LLM would have a chance to become superintelligent but considering how there's already multiple companies competing with one another to make the "best" LLM, there's almost no reason to really actually consider the scenario of only one single LLM existing.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-10-31T01:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzFWjPxkVWOsujH9ll4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzT_V6rjZMblmZFKhx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwPqhU1Y94q7MlruVl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwhmHIKsyvU8aT63894AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyagZ-OLXQ1iiUpu-d4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"horror"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfF7u5seJ-9W784G94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwc8cwVmqY2yStK5qp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzm40otCkmJW9KHb0l4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyBGAG-3NHjz1r77Pp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugww88gxC1xcl4ZN7Cp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]