Raw LLM Responses

There are three scenarios: 1. Use of AI will become only allowed by companies like Disney, Google, Apple, Microsoft etc.. the same way how first anyone could steal music trough Napster or Pirate Bay etc until everything became now owned by ”Copyright owners” like label companies etc. while the original artists barely make enough to support themselves. Soon there is no need for original artists as those companies can generate all the music they want or keep regurgitating the same music as before. The same would happen to all visual art from paintings to video to 3D animation to games. If an individual makes art no one will believe or care it is made by a human and big companies would just make that art seem insignificant from the ways their AI could steal and add to it. 2. AI systems become open to most people and everyone will have to start use them as a tool to not be left behind including all the original artists. These artists may thus also find work as AI trainers from multitudes of companies in such an open market. The only way this could happen is trough total democratization of the use of AI which most artists would not agree on as it would require as much open source material, data as possible thus “copyright type” laws would not be beneficial. 3. Something between where most art is generated by big companies with extremely sophisticated AI and then some lucky indie original artists that group up with some smaller AI companies can barely survive. In most of these situations the winner is not the artist, unfortunately.. the same way a content producer on YouTube or a music band will not be able to support themselves unless they either become part of the system or fight it.