Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Peoples must understand, that the so call A.I just recycling something that was …
ytc_UgxsLXnvq…
G
I REALLY NEED YOUR HELP BECAUSE I AM SCAREDD !!! I am a high school student and …
ytc_UgyKi6IcK…
G
In my opinion, it should always favour the lives of others over the passengers a…
ytc_UgwvKTI5i…
G
I totally agree. But how do I persuade AI art is still bad even if the prompter …
ytc_UgwIrMGSU…
G
Finnish police managed to box in a self driving Tesla. Drunk driver slept behind…
ytc_UgxzKMbaA…
G
@JustAGuy_AtYT most likely nobody, these ai companies tend to be chaotic with wh…
ytr_UgysD9p3x…
G
You don’t think that people realize that companies producing AI products would u…
ytc_Ugx3-YaZU…
G
When will you understand that it’s not built! It’s tapped into, AI is just a bei…
ytc_UgxkwkTfm…
Comment
NO, NO , NO... What people call “AGI” right now is mostly marketing. LLMs and “agents” are useful, but they are not general intelligence. LLMs scale with a clear problem: you burn vastly more compute for smaller gains. That diminishing return matters because it turns “just scale it” into a power and cost wall. A system that needs huge GPU farms to get marginal improvements is not on a clean path to human level general intelligence. And the “agent” layer doesn’t fix the core issue. Agents are task loops: call the model, check output, call tools, retry, patch failures, repeat. That can reduce hallucinations by adding filters and verification steps, but it’s still a brittle routine. It’s closer to automated workflow than a mind. Iterating until you get a coherent answer is not the same as understanding, learning, or reasoning robustly across new situations. So yes, LLMs have a scaling and efficiency problem, and agents are mostly a wrapper that compensates for weaknesses. That combination can produce impressive demos, but it’s not AGI.
youtube
2026-02-06T09:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxULa83FZ45v4baS4B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxOMcz4ECaofmsxYRB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyAHji4ybUbrw9hApl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyq-wZA5h8aqDzbkXB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgybcsHqzXzMqgDQFIR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxDEk5XLRAtwFS0dIV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYrnJRGPMuJMah83x4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw4SY4f03fOfKYHNhx4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyRQzKHHbaaOgtfcDR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"hope"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYsTz43jL9j9D914F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]