Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
Uh.. the victim isn’t to blame. The “self driving car” is COMPLETELY at fault here. First of all, it doesn’t matter if what that woman did was stupid. That car is DESIGNED TO PREVENT COLLISION. That sums up that part of my case. I’m going to quickly ask a question to you folks. If a driverless car hits somebody else in the future, who’s to blame? The company that created it or the victim of the accident? How about nobody. That way more “accidental” deaths can be blamed on our mere existence. Companies are capitalizing on our stupidity people, wake up. Self driving cars are a disaster waiting to happen. This is all a scheme so that companies circumvent lawsuits. One last thing: 90% of the car collisions occur with regular people driving the cars involved, correct? Does that 10% only include the meager amounts of driverless cars that are on the roads currently? Because 10% is a hell of a lot of when you think of the small amounts of driverless cars that are being used. Do correct me if I’m wrong.
youtube AI Harm Incident 2018-03-20T23:5… ♥ 3
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policyliability
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgxFJtqeM3cDZ9wub4l4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgweQmJrft7vyWsqUUp4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugw0NOoclzDJsEeOqQF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyHNVh5VJmLBoFhIhN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy30j-MLGTPJEoQbbh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"} ]