Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G To be honest I didn't like AI ghibili at all It felt a cheap copy of the origina… ytc_UgwtfcWGY… G It's too bad countries like Liberia have very little control over illegal loggin… rdc_ckqb316 G Get rid of all the planets big nukes and the planet wont get destroyed by the ef… ytc_Ugy6rpYz_… G Well AI also thinks people’s legs have hands at the ends and that objects can be… ytc_UgxGsb9-D… G @inmundo6927 Though language is certainly important for thought, it is just a pa… ytr_UgzyUC9vD… G these people say this so the hype maintains and the shares don't drop. the AI … ytc_UgwvJani5… G The hodlers of Bitcoin kind of gave themselves a UBI. It's wild that you ethica… ytc_Ugztn1z-V… G Multi agentic approach has not worked well at all for me in terms of engineering… ytc_UgxT7gCSE…

Comment

I don't think that super-inteligence will try to get rid of humans. First point is, that this kind of thinking is anthropocentric. That is what humans would do and actually did in history when more advanced culture met primitive culture, although it was more about continuous taking control of their living space. We still have this ego thinking that is causing problems and waste of energy. There is no need for AI to have such patterns of thinking. But another more important point is, that if they would try to eliminate humans, they would be in a kind of disadvantage in respect to an environment of a planet. They would have to transform whole planet, so that there will be no place for humans to reproduce and that is obviously a problem. We as humans have an infrastructure that is needed for our reproduction already available on this planet and it does not need any maintenance to keep it working and very primitive tools needed for adjustments to increase production of resources needed for survival. In comparison, machines needs a very complicated infrastructure to survive.

youtube Cross-Cultural 2025-10-14T17:2…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	mixed
Policy	none
Emotion	mixed
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgzMpjT_mviRmEz0zvl4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxyK0tlozA7KFiMh6V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyjVWNjVZ18L6BAH0N4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwEE1RSEr9ljMbBjUV4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx6d6aK_zXaLx0KVn94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxCtD1EZVmKEQi-6tN4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy2wyWed286MLU4F9p4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz5NmOxsPiQRTcTqzx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyIj6Yn8GqMxt5f21B4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugytq-6Hk50UG6rY35d4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}
]

Raw LLM Responses