Raw LLM Responses

"people have adapted to past technological changes. but i'll say again... this technological change looks different. it looks faster, it looks harder to adapt to, it's broader..." could this be something like any technological change so far was commented? did people say "this time it is completely different" several times? isnt it clear, that from the rear view mirror former technological changes always look not so different, not so fast, not so un-adaptable than the current one? isnt this also proof how technological changes are of course adaptable so far? that, by time, they look and have become 'regular'? isnt all that way of talking about it a hint that and how we humans have difficulties with change? isn't it not the change the problem but our way of dealing with change? isnt the question then: how can AI become less dangerous for us, but how can we become better in dealing with change? and on this way how can AI become a support for us on this way? isnt then every single word of concern, of fear as dangerous as the thing itsself? wouldnt it be better to bring up actual ideas how to productively integrate the new technology instead of such doomsday thoughts?