Raw LLM Responses

I'm a musician, I have ADHD, and there is one valid argument I feel to the disability thing: by the time I get home from a long day working I barely have enough time and mental energy to work on my own artform, never mind pick up a pencil and learn another from scratch and the one Anti-AI argument I HATE is "pick up a pencil bro". Obviously that means I have to just accept I won't be an artist, and AI can't replace that because it's soulless, but I think AI art and AI music CAN be good for communicating your vision to an actual artist, and that's something I've done in the past. Personally, I wouldn't be offended if someone came to me with an AI-created tune and said "hey, can you make me a song like this?" What I'd like to see is more granular, augment-you-not-replace-you AI tools in music like Synthesizer V's Solaria. It works like a vocaloid, with a piano roll that you can input lyrics on, but it ends up with a quite natural-sounding vocalist for your songs. And that was consensually trained off a real singer's (Emma Rowley's) voice. Another one is Ozone 11, which helps with mixing and mastering; it won't give you a completely professional sounding output, but it gives you a good baseline to tweak yourself and saves a lot of time and effort. As always, the problem is capitalism and the managers who rode the hype train and unironically thought they could use this to replace artists. But take it from someone whose artform has been going through this trend repeatedly: The synth didn't cause real instruments to go extinct. The drum machine didn't put real drummers out of a job. The digital audio workstation and orchestral samples didn't cause real orchestras to disappear. You artists will survive this, and some of you may even end up using some level of AI in your workflows.