Raw LLM Responses

-Minor Disagreements: 02:03 Aren't you inspiring and contributing to the art by writing the prompt that your audience is using to create the story_ 07:46 Why does someone need consent to look or use freely available images of the Internet 08:11 How can you argue that it doesn't take skill to create ai art if you are not able to reproduce the work "good ai" artist(obviously not shadlyn) There are obviously skills required to create prompts that give you the desired output 10:03 Do you research the origin of the art style to credit the originators or is it too much work 10:21 It is always funny to me how the most influential and powerful in a given field are the loudest who cry about this nonsense I am certain that most of them are plagiarist themselves 11:46 But you created the outcome 11:49 How can this destroy art_ The only thing that this is threatening is the ability of people to make money with art 11:53 I agree with you but beauty is in the eye of the beholder and we are not the one to decide 11:59 Cope harder is just a deflection. Again nor you or I or anyone else get to decide what art is it in the eye of the beholder And if someone likes his product I'm not the one to tell them that it's art and they are wrong for likeing it(Thanks For making me defend Shedlyn) 12:23 This seems like an hypocritical take of someone who rents for 42 minutes about some one else having a different opinion on art. And you come across as very heated and hateful. So how is his statement wrong(Thanks For making me defend Shedlyn) 12:57 If he would get praise from a lot of people would this change the situation_ if not what are you even saying_ 13:07/14:53 Couldn't someone ask you the same thing 13:40 If you steal from a shop the thing you stole stolen isn't in the shop any more. This is a categorically different from the situation with art 13:50 You don't seem to care ore like much about these things either. You want to change them 14:59 please provide one example of an independent artist (all artists depend on work they have previously have seen. Mostly without consent) 15:23 Why do you get to decide what art is 15:47 isn't your argument kind of that it does take a massive amount of skill And look on all the skill you need and he isn't willing to make the effort to learn drawing 15:55 The same applies to ai art just in the form of prompts 16:08 Hmmmm observe, practice and apply. Are you claiming that with prompt writing you don't have to do any of this 16:26 Are you claiming you are not involved in the artistic process of creating the endproduct 16:39 If the artistry is in your book then why didn't you give them just the book to create the pictures 16:48 How do they not belonging to your artistry_ if without your artistry they wouldn't exist. Even if you are not drawing the picture you still have a massive artistic influence on the product 16:57 Why should the art of multiple artists belong to only one 17:34 Where is the error in the statement_ if ai art looks like sh``t and human art doesn't why should some one with good art be afraid of sh``ty ai art The only reason to be afraid is if the AI art is an actual competition to human art 17:48 Doesn't his art have value based on the fact that people attribute value to it(Thanks For making me defend Shedlyn and his sh``ty art) 18:17 So you don't care about art you care more about the process of creating it and who is paid for it 18:49 Again where is the error in this statement_ With more theoretical knowledge about art you can create a better prompt and therefore a better result 20:12 I understand that it is distinct from drawing but how is it not requiring a skill 21:19 Wouldn't this also prove that the creators of Supergirl are just plagiarists and the only thing that have done is gender swapping Superman 21:37 How do you create a new idea_ what is the test you apply to check whether or not someone had this idea prior and just inspired you 21:47 they can! The picture shown wasn't created before. Supergirl did not exist with this face for example 21:53 These look existed prior to Supergirl. so what is the criticism_ the creators of Supergirl did not invent the skirt, did not invent the emblem on her chest, did not invent the cape and most other features in the picture. All of them were created prior 22:03 How does the same not apply to humans. Please tell me the process of creating something new that is uninspired 23:28 Why couldn't you(I am not necessarily saying that you could I don't even know the characters you are talking about but I also don't see a reason for why ai couldn't do it) 23:36 How can you see a personality 23:39 These characters do not look unique to me in any way shape or form they are just characters in a Chibi Anime style. There are preexisting characters with every single feature shown in this image from hairstyle to clothing to everything else You didn't come up with it. You were inspired by other artists that done this prior. -Have you paid them? -Have you recognized them in your art? -Did you give them any credit? -Did you develop your skill based on only non copyrighted material? (The image looked good but it wasn't unique because you can find similar things in millions of other pictures) 24:33 Sorry but what power or authority does Shedlyn have 26:14 I don't think he's lying I think he's genuinely holding this Believe 26:36 If the zookeeper was thinking it why is it wrong to write it down_ I my position is Writing a wrong statement in a nonfiction book isn't actually a problem. The problem is if the person you're writing about didn't hold the position And by the way humans are animals. Therefore there is nothing wrong in principle with superimposing an animal thought and another animal. 34:34 Don't you have to agree that he is inspiring people even if you disagree with the kind inspiration (I don't like the way he inspires people. I don't like the message with which he inspires people but It would be dishonest of me to deny that he is inspiring people) 36:02 Isn't it egotistical if an artist is placing himself in front and/or above the art. (Shedlyn does this way more than you) 36:20 Yes it is extremely sad that artists want to be held on a pedestal just because they can draw lines and squiggles that resemble something. (It's not this is not my position just the application of your logic to your statement) 36:47 You are not talking about art you are talking about the material conditions of the artist. 36:55 How are takes on restricting AI art not political or In other words how are policies on the AI art not political_ 37:23 If you specify the artist as musician and otherwise let the statement stand word for word it is exactly the same nonsense that I was spewing about electronic music -What about the people that learned an instrument and now you don't have to do this in cheating in stealing their ideas up -You don't have to learn theory it's enough to go by trial and error -You didn't create the samples -You didn't write the program -You didn't invent the instrument -You most likely didn't start the genre you making music in in 38:34 How does the same not apply to AI art and/or prompt writing (With the exception of "your own words"[Did you come up with the words or the language?<-This is extremely pedantic jab and not serious]) 39:03 Based on some of his opinions and statements I think he wrote the book he wanted to and I don't think that it would have changed much if he red the script more often and also I don't see a Categorical difference between his worldview and his book(Both are still is very Bad) 40:13 What action does make an artist or what do you need to do to be an artist 40:33 You didn't invent your art style. It isn't it stolen by your logic I would hope for a constructive conversation on this topic because I don't think that we actually disagree that much(I'm assuming except for the intellectual property stuff)