Raw LLM Responses

In that last part about copyright you speak as if artists are unable to create anything new and that copyrights should not exist; explaining it with a juvenile sketch as if it's didactic; but the truth is that nobody is buying your character as a "product" copyrights are an artifact of capitalism, that artists must sell their work as products to survive. I know you leftists dream with this socialist revolution that never comes, but in the real world artists need to sell products to survive and the copyright is their best friend. I am just waiting for this bad take to end with the words "but small creators only make furry art anyway" or "artists are petite bourgeoise" and this will basically be like those tankie forum where tech brocialists decides whos a worker and who is not. Once again you think of art as just treats. You just see the finished product, the thing delivered to your home and you wish it was cheaper, more like mass produced vending machine object delivered to your home for pennies that nobody owns. This isn't letism; It's libertarianism: People making this argument would happily take away the human element from any art and pretend that there was no work behind it. That it is a "free good" that anybody should take and that it spawns out of nowhere. Essentially this is what many workers fear out of AI... not that it is a miraculous system out to get them. What is clearly threatening about these AI's is that they provide the perfect talking point for idiots and malicious people to devalue their work. And basically say what you are saying in that last part: Artist you don't own anything you do, become more alienated. Thankyou for parroting that very "leftist" ideal.