Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I think companies like google and amazon incorporating AI into their voice assis…
ytc_Ugzsa7p2l…
G
It sounds like automated Trucking is going to do to the trucking industry what t…
ytc_UgyQu3XDr…
G
That’s why AI is really just to solve minutiae. People getting tricked by AI it’…
ytc_UgxArXtcc…
G
Ai could help solve the problem of doctors who have a bias towards women’s healt…
ytc_UgyaITIVy…
G
Made love to a robotic woman and now, I find out there's a robotic guy out looki…
ytr_UgxLUjgWe…
G
The video starting with the intodutcion of an anti ai movement called "Stop Kill…
ytc_Ugy0phgL1…
G
Theoretical questions are one thing but real life scenario leading to a clinical…
ytc_UgyNwLW8z…
G
Great vid but I think the AI has caught up . The ethical reasoning was still act…
ytc_Ugw-51nB-…
Comment
There are some things we can potentially look forwards to under AI. Industries where costs are inflated in part due to scarcity could become cheaper. Robot doctors would bring down the price of healthcare and perhaps give more Americans access to affordable preventative healthcare. Robot construction workers can potentially bring down the cost of building houses and make home ownership more affordable.
That being said, these two examples are currently prone to artificial scarcity. We don't build houses not because it's too expensive, but because there's so much red tape and BS because your neighbors don't want you to be able to build anything. We also limit the amount of doctors that we produce. Both of these things could be addressed without AI.
Additionally, making things cheaper isn't really a fix if the buyers are all unemployed. I have not yet seen a good answer to how we're going to find new work for people unable to compete with mass produced robots. This is a troubling question.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-10-08T18:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyIs8Nc-X3XG02wRCB4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxyJY4z-ytZycIJKeV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwfr-7mOAZIAdDSiwN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy5KzzTmB2mymcPcOx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxUCNryH-tRjBZDWcJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxrwCwNtF6GaIFfEDl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxa7DwpXrZhlhcX6rx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzD8Ge0yoDl4N6q1Pp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzDRpD1fjFD1fYVttx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzbFbs30rtdCzOgpud4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]