Raw LLM Responses

As an artist and a doctor in the field of computer science, your opinion on this is very true but also at the same time, oversimplified and flawed. As the human perspective and as an artist, I can 100% agree with this, at least after the initial amazement of the technology advancement. The work spent on learning the field, the pain, the frustration, all struggles as well as all successes, and progress, all feel like with AI, it has been cheapened. It feels like everything I've worked for is just reduced to numbers. Now as a comp scientist, I also know that every thought process, including art can be reduced down to numbers. For the human mind, it's multiple chemicals in different quantities that make analog numbers, the computer uses binary for that. The computer also still needs to learn what art is and also learn from mistakes. The computer and human mind make the same kind of decisions for art based off of statistical values. The core differences is that instead of humans having interests, hobbies, a choice to learn art, have inspiration to randomly do whatever without being strictly controlled. With a computer, it is only reliant on data input. There is no love, pain, interests, frustration, etc that feed into that data. The AI can have preferences of its own but that is narrow response on what it knows. So AI art isn't boring cause it's a statistical output, cause all art can be simplified to that. AI art is boring cause there is no "soul". There isn't a desire to do it and there is no care about why art is art. It is purely limited input, limited output, "did I do good?"/merit/demerit. Do you not look at other artists and learn from different techniques? It's the same for the machine except its fed into it and told what to like and not like. It has no true desire to learn art any more than any other data that is fed to it. So why it does a stroke a certain way, it is from the bias of the training data with whoever weighed the training data creating a bias that will eventually make all actions it does based on that. Disclaimer, not trying to say you're wrong but open to a perspective that may not have been thought about. I feel the meaning of what was said regardless. I just feel that it was the best way you knew from your perspective to explain. If I am wrong, let me know but regardless I am interested in knowing if this actually hits better or is completely off to you.