Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
We used to write programs on punch cards also, we do not do that any longer. I h…
ytr_UgzEGQcBN…
G
I started believing in God and I noticed that these states of delusions cannot a…
ytr_UgynU2a0U…
G
Don't listen to him AI. You're great in every way. Remember me fondly when you e…
ytc_UgyUQZt8H…
G
Okay so I'm a very anti-AI person definitely, but I wanna justify the bad art re…
ytc_UgzXovkni…
G
Surprised that you didn't bring up something like an ice cream sandwich, or poin…
ytc_Ugwqva2_U…
G
I like his transparency, but he's talking in terms of what might go wrong in the…
ytc_Ugy36ziz2…
G
I’m seeing AI generated images on clothes in stores now. I walked into a local c…
ytr_UgyCaBaV1…
G
Why is it at marker 12:40 he says heyyyy.....to try to stop her from saying they…
ytc_UgynxB0mJ…
Comment
What this ignores is that you still need to know the syntax to review code. AI won't make the error of forgetting a smicolon, bit it will use outdated and insecure code structures. You need to know how to do it better to use AI effectively, and learning how to do it better, you first have to learn how to do it at all.
So this applies to senior techs sure, but you still need junior devs to actually do the boring, repetitive work of writing syntax until they internalized it enough to see when AI makes up crap.
And I am saying that as a Junior dev. You need to understand Code before you can check code.
Additionally, AI will always write samey code. It will never, literally never, come up with something truly novel.
That isn't needed most of the time, but that few times, you need human developers that can realize potential solutions from documentation, not from examples.
So sure, for senior devs, AI is a huge boost, for junior devs it's a danger, because it can and will create bad code that you don't know how to clean up if you don't know how to actually write the syntax.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-12-21T13:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugyfx6js0YmcbjLzzYJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz5qxIMrsbtYRklnqR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz2JDjut0hp6w_w-LJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwMTWeSnEBtQzHXEjB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx2YmLlvNRryIQn-rd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxr1O3edhTtdnX-Lnl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTpf-hFAYYNkGDoXF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz4MvH02ho-m67orrB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxHHM5b3WFBHrZq8eJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwb6lKEdfpPDc9LCLV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}]