Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This is one of those things where yes ai is overall safer than HUMAN drivers but…
ytc_Ugz70pNbd…
G
Too much stuttering and or lags to NOT think this interview was all Ai on Rick M…
ytc_UgzJ0lfEl…
G
As a former translator I can just add that "back in my days" we never thought of…
ytr_UgwjuiGpN…
G
HOLLYWOOD! LOL😅😅😅😅 Hollywood will simply have to invest in AI creators to make …
ytc_Ugw6qBST3…
G
This is all BS. AI already took blue collar jobs. Now it is coming for white col…
ytc_Ugx5gQQIC…
G
we as humanity disagree to ai being used for anything but a limited tool for rec…
ytc_Ugx3VYkDU…
G
Hi Jonathan :)
Glad to know our video are helping you understand the concept ver…
ytr_UgzvenLnh…
G
Yeah nah lawyers makes absolutely no sense. You hire a lawyer to protect you in …
ytc_UgxYyRwIh…
Comment
I have listened to several podcasts about AI from Hilton, Yann and others as well as this debate recently. Unfortunately despite my optimism and expectation for incredible advances and improvements in biotech and health fields, the “cons” seem to have a more disinterested and higher level of intelligence and know how versus the “pros” which at least in this debate have a privledged, condescending vision that as long as whatever unknown percent of humanity is harmed, as long as it is not them, it’s okay. I heard very subtle arguments that someone will program and thus decide what hate speech and misinformation is, and they assume they know, that is the biggest threat. And they will foster it: a drone, servant society, I was not sure I get the universal application of having a staff of people who work for me is applicable to everyone. A very elitist and biased benefit. Would expect nothing less from a tenured ivory tower liberal prof. The cons clearly won the debate because they showed mastery of the topic and a sober questioning of benefits and risks
youtube
AI Governance
2023-08-14T02:5…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzqjcU5s0EGaSx9rr94AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz4yJJiiOAOYXo5_cZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxqJbCuv0UDklVMndB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw0aQNYWCDWyiC_OEV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzsA1Hg1TLdGGKFQct4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyLdGde9j0SCESmJOV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYiBL4LA2b7mlBlbp4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx6F1Mrx5_Isg9338N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx1g1sq6s7WJhZuugB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfQyEd-8JYAMIDKUp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}
]