Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
It’s possible to do a check out without doing facial recognition.
This is just…
rdc_jck1gcu
G
Companies have pushed AI on us for over a year!! Pharmas & biotechs shedding a …
ytc_UgzwviFlt…
G
He went from ai is a bubble to ai will kill us all after reading one book. I do …
ytc_UgywYasgp…
G
This wired magazine special from 2016 talks about Shenzhen. They started as a fi…
rdc_ewep7u5
G
You're taking a move as old as the freaking industrial revolution and painting i…
rdc_jpshktc
G
@legion8328 No, you don't get it. AI EMULATES emotions, it does not EXPERIENCE t…
ytr_Ugy-pZgqp…
G
The problem is not that AI is becoming more intelligent.
The problem is that any…
ytc_UgzY7MIXm…
G
Or could we make robots to help and care for those in need? Like your robot goes…
ytc_Ugw3OAUC8…
Comment
I have listened to several podcasts about AI from Hilton, Yann and others as well as this debate recently. Unfortunately despite my optimism and expectation for incredible advances and improvements in biotech and health fields, the “cons” seem to have a more disinterested and higher level of intelligence and know how versus the “pros” which at least in this debate have a privledged, condescending vision that as long as whatever unknown percent of humanity is harmed, as long as it is not them, it’s okay. I heard very subtle arguments that someone will program and thus decide what hate speech and misinformation is, and they assume they know, that is the biggest threat. And they will foster it: a drone, servant society, I was not sure I get the universal application of having a staff of people who work for me is applicable to everyone. A very elitist and biased benefit. Would expect nothing less from a tenured ivory tower liberal prof. The cons clearly won the debate because they showed mastery of the topic and a sober questioning of benefits and risks
youtube
AI Governance
2023-08-14T02:5…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzqjcU5s0EGaSx9rr94AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz4yJJiiOAOYXo5_cZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxqJbCuv0UDklVMndB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw0aQNYWCDWyiC_OEV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzsA1Hg1TLdGGKFQct4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyLdGde9j0SCESmJOV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYiBL4LA2b7mlBlbp4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx6F1Mrx5_Isg9338N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx1g1sq6s7WJhZuugB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfQyEd-8JYAMIDKUp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}
]