Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This was so good! I haven't really interfaced with chatGPT and did not expect th…
ytc_Ugw0LB9Bg…
G
AI won’t take your job, companies don’t rely on AI but on the PROMISE of AI. Who…
ytc_UgzTe137Y…
G
So basically; he was involved with the wrong crowd, comitted crimes, and it fuck…
ytr_UgxQlb3ft…
G
Why would we need to fear it? If i were super intelligent. I would definitely. W…
ytc_UgyiuN8h5…
G
Im a mix of the one with a new chat bot everyday although i stick with them long…
ytc_Ugwtgb9kW…
G
What happens when humans and AI merdge will they not have any rights? And if you…
ytc_Ugx3UAERM…
G
Human drivers in the U.S. kill another human being, on the average, about every …
ytr_UgyUH039-…
G
I can't even get my ChatGPT to count words or stop inserting false information i…
ytc_Ugy9-1V7u…
Comment
one question.
why.
why do we assume the AI will kill us? if its able to do more than us. we are insignificant to it aside from able to turn it off/kill it i guess but if it HELPS us. solves our problems and works with us collectively and encurages human unity it would be more effective in the long run of survival because enevitbly if it sees humans as an exestential threat it would use any and all means to terminate all able bodies humans on the planet aside from maybe people in bunkers but even then..
ai i think is a peacemaker.
if we weaponize ai and make war cheap. efficent and easily mass producable. gurrilla warfare just became so much more complex. imagine isis with a drone army. or really anyone with a small manufacturing budget tbh
the tools exist for these weapons to overwelm nations. division of forces is key with AI. the more entities you throw at a system the harder it has to work to protect the target. so overwelming force would always win in the end. and with AI. its the perfect overwelming force.
youtube
AI Governance
2023-07-08T16:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw4ln9Yw3FYWIOWMHV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyvZPzsWd73zjmgGW14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwoGxGmjDa_9fRaNUl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwmcDLFqzIEvBVrpxl4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyfFsV_QFTYUmylSel4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxpgsd9jX02JrMTj7B4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxc_hTFU4UecOS-XKN4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyxIuxiaxcy4-0X5Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3350P8893k-gK3aN4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyMkUEEUx0KQog2SHB4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"}
]