Raw LLM Responses

Step 1: Scrap the Internet for content, copyrighted or not, without credit or consent. Step 2: Claim that the data you stole, and base your entire commercial product on without compensation, was so large it would be inconvenient to respect copyright and would "hinder progress". Step 3: Rush to exploit the industries you are introducing AI to before regulations can take place, claiming it's democratizing art and improving productivity, all the while trying to cut out the middle man who's work you stole that makes your product possible, when AI only really benefits CEOs, and those at the top. Step 4: Profit. It's not that hard, all artists want is their consent to be respected, their work to be credited, and their time compensated. Just like any other work. People are so used to getting "free" art, that they think there is no effort in creating it, and that those that create it are entitled with time, and so shouldn't be compensated for their effort. If you think prompting (glorified google search really) is act of creation, you're just telling me you never bothered lifting a pencil in your life. I'll never understand the desire to say "I made this" and feel proud of it, when you've let something or someone else do it for you. Regardless if you want to call AI/ML art or not, it doesn't matter, when its creation depends completely on corrupted seed of theft. It doesn't matter how good the meal the chef makes is, if he stole all the ingredients from nearby stores to make it. I'm so tired.