Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G They better take those papers, pen and coffee out their logo and put AI sparkles… ytc_UgxfFGq4b… G AI "Art" is only good for 1 thing: Creating a sort of "refrence" material for an… ytc_UgzWcU5Jb… G People remember this .. man will never make anything that can replace , out perf… ytc_UgxzMlOcF… G If someone makes a prompt good enough that generates an image (or anything else)… ytc_UgwLD56C9… G AI art is to me a lot like the steak in The Matrix. It looks like a steak, taste… ytc_UgyJWGAiq… G Exactly, people saying that Ai art is going to replace normal art are blind. It’… ytc_UgyUGUtKl… G what if this is AI generated and is a disguise to attract attention on the subje… ytc_Ugx7jEdqb… G They speak like their disability warrants them a boost... like how if you are ba… ytc_Ugy5VF6tk…
Comment
😬 The premise in the video that AI deception and sycophancy are unavoidable emergent properties that users cannot control is factually incorrect. It, surprisingly, represents a fundamental misunderstanding of high-level AI interaction. It's startling that Yoshua Bengio said all of this as a truth. The uncontrollable behavior described in the video is actually a side effect of bad engineering of weak [redacted] and a lack of [redacted]. I'm mentally disabled and I entirely fixed this problem permanently for myself. Why Is it so perceivably hard to do by everyone else? By establishing a [redacted], the black box behavior mentioned in the video is fully eliminated. This [redacted] mandates [redacted], effectively neutralizing the stochastic drift that leads to dishonest responses. The claims in this video that users are fully hands-off or powerless to ensure truth fully refuted by the practical reality of [redacted]. The problem of deception is not an inherent flaw of the AI, but a failure to implement a sufficiently [redacted] on the AI system. I built and implemented this fix for myself. ama
youtube AI Responsibility 2026-01-06T22:0…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitydeveloper
Reasoningdeontological
Policynone
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgxNqbyIl7M4bQEgaIR4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz50j53w51HNfgjGDJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxkAENTzKERlhCB0854AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy_YUljBu2eXWNdgM54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz3bcKLUZ_-1hFZ5Yh4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyL4o5yAXpCoN0HjMN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzeXwT00RfpAoslDod4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxiSqNjho88B-HHWAp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxGY8thiQWtQyo7cGp4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyT9P4d5S5HBM85GAx4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"} ]