Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G The companies you refer to will make things previously bought by humans. With hu… ytc_UgwXAYdOi… G 12:20 I think all the time about an ex-friend who told me that I should talk to … ytc_UgxL5qECS… G Lazy students, lazy teachers, lazy cops and lazy people using AI instead of thei… ytc_UgygIFOMA… G that makes so much sense because serpent is knowledge and ai is a form of knowle… ytc_UgxHgZSwV… G That's why education needs to go back to the states. Dismantle the dept of Educa… ytc_Ugw6etK4C… G Black man 99.9% likely to be involved in a shooting ...Is shot twice You do r… ytc_UgxlEzEKX… G Well now a days I cant even say ai art is worse than human art 😅😢… ytc_UgzNV-BY3… G compared to a camera or brush, the ai dosent need any human behind or infront of… ytc_UgyYJWndD…

Comment

I think the central flaw of thought experiments like this is we assume that a self driving car can only drive and react like a person can. Our current traffic is made up of millions of individuals that usually drive faster than they can realistically keep track of their surroundings. And they have almost no communication with each other. If we connect our self driving machines as part of a larger whole and equip them with the sensors and processing power to react properly then most of the issues we currently have would disappear. Instead of thinking about how a self driving car decides who dies, we need to look at ways to make them able to avoid having to make these decisions at all. For example, program the car in our experiment to keep a proper stopping distance behind heavy vehicles with open loads. The accident in question could be avoided by simply applying the brakes on the cars immediately behind, and merging cars further back into other lanes. Have the central traffic system flag the accident site once the boxes stop moving and send clean up vehicles.

youtube AI Harm Incident 2021-07-31T08:5…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	industry_self
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugzslwt9QiheJpWRbfp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxcu2cWNWH8_geonwJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXxgUBr-1VnhEAZzd4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwugIWuRy3J137G9j14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx2e0zPvlz0YqnvIjZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvMPLnc85qWm1CCV14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxcvVkDSDnxfMmBnS94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSIBvE8zK_FrylW6d4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxTbdc_xoYz5h6zmE54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwIxDwsTLHdFBsCgnx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]

Raw LLM Responses