Raw LLM Responses

Am still amazed that judges let AI work be and guy keep that reward. That one fiasko with AI art in that pokemon competition didn't slide that easily. Ai would need to get some ethics and laws how to use it, like it should be illegal that anyone basically can create copycat AI and have it specifically copy someone else's works than your own. Posting AI works as they are shouldn't be ok, if people claim to be artists they use Ai stuff as references but never post as it is as there really ain't creative process with Ai tools at all. Write a prompt, wait that this random artwork generator pushes out something cool. It leaves you graving something more; like getting inspiration from that creation perhaps, or from it's colors or redoing it and fixing every mistake there is. It could serve was "spot all errors and train your artistic eye" exercise. But as art as it is? O hell no. It really would need more work being put into it. Like lot more artistic work. Also things weren't this bad AI creators had proposed collab to artists with a proper fee and they did not. None of them did as what am aware of. They could also include some backup system that would not allow AI to be trained to using artist's works. Sure it would piss off some users but they should have known better.