Raw LLM Responses

The only positive of generative AI (in realms of art) I have found is jumpstarting creativity. Artists, writers, hell, even COOKS just start out from something AI prompted, to test if it is reliable or to kickstart their own project. AI as a co-thinking tool to give you an idea you can pursue is a cool thing. AI to rob humanity of the very nuance of creating something nuancely-flawed (and therefore beautiful) is what the problem is. EDIT: I read my comment through again and maybe I am not clear on this (I am passionate about humane use of AI, sorry - I try to advocate for both sides, because I see AI like a growing, teachable child rather than something devilish. Sorry.). What I have meant by prompting creativity is that here, as you can see, people show how an idea can be interpreted many different ways - and here just out of sheer spite! Without this prompt, these pictures might have never been created. In this scenario, I see AI as a nudge on our creativity, on our "what if", and if we, humans, pursue this notion, then I think AI and human can coexist in the realm of creating things. Outsourcing creativity fully to AI to generate cheap, shiny knick-knacks is something I have problems with, and am advocating against total generative AI overtake of creative jobs.