Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G This idea seems ridiculous to me, because people aren't smart enough to rule eve… ytc_UgyqMJeY-… G Aucune mention des millions de tonnes de CO2 qui vont être envoyés dans l'atmosp… ytc_UgxHnQ1lk… G They are selling AI snake oil. Look at his nervousness. He’s crying through his … ytc_UgyWeAUif… G The thing most missed is that language itself is a self contained intelligence. … ytc_UgyzpMEl8… G the thing with glaze and nightshade atm is that there is no actual proof it does… ytc_Ugz7rW7Tr… G Democratizing the field and lowering the barriers to enter isn't an argument. I … ytr_UgwbmYHEk… G I think the use for ai that most people could agree on is what Doug Doug does, m… ytr_UgyGybGDg… G We’ve destroyed our water tables and local environments for these data centers. … ytc_UgzffFqPb…

Comment

Automation is never an issue. As long as there is stuff to get done, which there always will be, anyone who is productive will benefit. There are two cases to explain. The first to immediately get rid of is the case where resources do not constrain AI. In this scenario, we are post scarcity and you can just enact whatever Utopian vision you want. This will never happen. However, there won't be infinite availability to AI and it will be constrained by resources and have a positive cost. As that cost decreases, the _comparative_ advantage between humans and AI changes and our productivity frontier expands overall so long as we specialize. This means that the relative value of low-value jobs which aren't amenable to AI yet or aren't prioritized yet will go up and peoplenwiol work these jobs as their wages go up. Remember, automation adds more stuff to the economy and hence the value of those goods and services will go down relative to those not yet automated. Trade is always mutually beneficial and productivity tools always make everyone better off than they were beforehand.

youtube AI Harm Incident 2024-07-29T16:2… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	none
Emotion	approval
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgzX5_w0VIziVjTUDJV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxxvn5dEWGH6YA-rlp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwk-cuVmzOCTVXnv3R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyMT0f7f6JiMM4xVct4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzzMSBd3luJNyVEueZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_lHbpfVQ2IKY6mNx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyj_I-TpRoqB1aEayN4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwt5qU4i-acfFWEThh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy0XAEG_3kPw7PJTZR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyCrySiNA9Rt7VYSXl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}
]

Raw LLM Responses