Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
If AI does all the jobs, we will go back to medieval economy with a class of lor…
ytc_UgyLothQ0…
G
Wtf, how did you make that a positive? That minorities will be even more affecte…
rdc_esqj2mv
G
@LainorLean go to deviantart>topics>AI art and scroll through for a few minutes.…
ytr_UgwLAg0cl…
G
WE SHOULD INVEST HEAVILY ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IF WE WANT TO BE SUPER POWER…
ytc_UgxNaVrND…
G
Life, your body-mind, the world, AI, and all of space-time constitute a dream. Y…
ytc_UgyPW_THf…
G
This hearing was somewhat encouraging. We do need a new regulatory agency, beca…
ytc_Ugz7CrEzO…
G
🧐. 2:49 Rich AI companies should not be that powerful! Time to put the brakes on…
ytc_UgygNOxVU…
G
Haha, I get the reference! It’s interesting to think about how AI and robots can…
ytr_Ugy4qNw3D…
Comment
Look from different perspective: as someone who creates AI and from professional standpoint is really impressed by those models I feel like slowing their development by limiting access to data might not be the best way.
Instead I'll aim more into limiting access to AI (paid access maybe or slower, moderated output) and post-creation governance of the pictures. So something like searching the internet for similarities to generated pictures (using AI!) and not outputting them if similarity is more than some threshold (let's say 70-80%) to existing artwork. Or simply making it impossible to input any artist name (except those who aren't affected negatively, so dead for many years or volunteering) in a prompt.
Right to opt out of using their work as samples (tic on a profile recognizable by scrappers is a good idea) seems like no brainer thing that should be implemented right away, but defaulting to asking permission will slow down AI image HUGELY and might hurt its own evolution into something more independent.
Thank you for attending my Ted talk.
youtube
2023-02-08T10:2…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw4ABbMSAh5gy-8hNl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxQLpHUcgB46IDwQLh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz2yUHwMhrWfcRlliV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXmpSwD9JMlE-2xHV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyO01wOsaPYlswJ7eR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwAeEg9F1gI42Bx9NJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwMU1uQExm2y4VNAhl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8eAuIdyEZ_cEptal4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzELyhmHP44SMcK6n54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZgSb-Gyf-rgH6jFF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]