Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I disagree with the Ai/Healthcare combination. Working in this field for the las…
ytc_UgzOBsqOF…
G
Waymo should just by Tesla Model 3's and equip them with Lidar. It would be way…
ytc_UgzDc_g1v…
G
FSD does exist? It is better every software update
Have you seen it? To me it'…
ytr_UgyPpboxo…
G
Isn’t this basically the same debate we had in the 1980s, when synthesizers were…
ytc_UgwG87XX3…
G
Remember the AI named hal in that movie 2010 space odyssey anyone??? This move w…
ytc_UgyS6Wt2k…
G
Lmao! This happened to me, and it was the best thing that could have possibly ha…
ytc_Ugza97z5m…
G
AI is a tool, a knif eint he hand of a surgeon saves life, a knife int he hard o…
ytc_UgxNRYQKZ…
G
Marina, your video is well-put together. The insights from the leaders, the step…
ytc_UgxugKvII…
Comment
Look from different perspective: as someone who creates AI and from professional standpoint is really impressed by those models I feel like slowing their development by limiting access to data might not be the best way.
Instead I'll aim more into limiting access to AI (paid access maybe or slower, moderated output) and post-creation governance of the pictures. So something like searching the internet for similarities to generated pictures (using AI!) and not outputting them if similarity is more than some threshold (let's say 70-80%) to existing artwork. Or simply making it impossible to input any artist name (except those who aren't affected negatively, so dead for many years or volunteering) in a prompt.
Right to opt out of using their work as samples (tic on a profile recognizable by scrappers is a good idea) seems like no brainer thing that should be implemented right away, but defaulting to asking permission will slow down AI image HUGELY and might hurt its own evolution into something more independent.
Thank you for attending my Ted talk.
youtube
2023-02-08T10:2…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw4ABbMSAh5gy-8hNl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxQLpHUcgB46IDwQLh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz2yUHwMhrWfcRlliV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXmpSwD9JMlE-2xHV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyO01wOsaPYlswJ7eR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwAeEg9F1gI42Bx9NJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwMU1uQExm2y4VNAhl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8eAuIdyEZ_cEptal4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzELyhmHP44SMcK6n54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZgSb-Gyf-rgH6jFF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]