Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Bro these aren't even AI! They are LLM's these dumb, glorified siri chatbots hav…
ytc_Ugxb3M94I…
G
I love these AI focused episodes. Thanks for splitting them off, it's much easi…
ytc_UgxU_e4_q…
G
These videos target core instincts. Using the same on both sides would further d…
ytr_UgwDULgcx…
G
His long poem-like post seemed more like a cry for attention from someone who di…
ytc_UgzI1UShT…
G
Exactly. Another way AI is an equalizer is, even if it eradicates some jobs, tha…
ytr_UgxN9O16B…
G
The investment in AI to try and come for high skilled jobs that require an IQ ov…
ytc_UgyXrjTfk…
G
So did anybody ask those AI magnates who's going to buy the stuff they sell afte…
ytc_Ugxh5ZwmS…
G
Those are not fully autonomous drones of the type that the DOD^* is investing in…
rdc_ohu3s40
Comment
Look from different perspective: as someone who creates AI and from professional standpoint is really impressed by those models I feel like slowing their development by limiting access to data might not be the best way.
Instead I'll aim more into limiting access to AI (paid access maybe or slower, moderated output) and post-creation governance of the pictures. So something like searching the internet for similarities to generated pictures (using AI!) and not outputting them if similarity is more than some threshold (let's say 70-80%) to existing artwork. Or simply making it impossible to input any artist name (except those who aren't affected negatively, so dead for many years or volunteering) in a prompt.
Right to opt out of using their work as samples (tic on a profile recognizable by scrappers is a good idea) seems like no brainer thing that should be implemented right away, but defaulting to asking permission will slow down AI image HUGELY and might hurt its own evolution into something more independent.
Thank you for attending my Ted talk.
youtube
2023-02-08T10:2…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw4ABbMSAh5gy-8hNl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxQLpHUcgB46IDwQLh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz2yUHwMhrWfcRlliV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXmpSwD9JMlE-2xHV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyO01wOsaPYlswJ7eR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwAeEg9F1gI42Bx9NJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwMU1uQExm2y4VNAhl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8eAuIdyEZ_cEptal4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzELyhmHP44SMcK6n54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZgSb-Gyf-rgH6jFF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]