Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Bernie, stop fear mongering. True ai is a hundred years always. I develop AI for…
ytc_UgwDzJux9…
G
im sorry what happened to you on those subreddits, i really dont know how i woul…
ytc_Ugw9TSMks…
G
I think that using AI to generate art is fine. But when you enter a competition…
ytc_Ugz_RLjx3…
G
Oh everyone, there seems to be no defense for AI. A good argument would always h…
ytc_Ugza2X6nQ…
G
I jave heard so many people say: oh you're artstyles isn't unique enough/ai can …
ytc_UgwIAkZmC…
G
The woods? We’ll never make it to the woods. A bio weapon will take out 99.9999%…
ytc_UgyeUAjwA…
G
That's a great point! Wisdom is often tied to experience and emotional understan…
ytr_Ugz4BdGtA…
G
1. Destroy their own software using AI
2. Customers flee your shitty product
3…
rdc_oh50u68
Comment
Am I missing something or would it not require businesses as a whole to willingly adopt any ai technology in order for it to be of worth and if employees decided to not work with ai the benefits could not be realized or the business as a whole would fail. Therefore it’s like having a great tool but if it’s not widely accepted because its adoption is recognized as a poison pill for the masses, it would not work as expected. If you force employees to use it or lose a job as ai embeds in business, the employees would see a zero sum game and not engage. A company can’t fire all its employees at once unless there is a guarantee of success. With ai it requires ongoing usage to learn and perfect itself so the workers have a say in how it needs to be developed and leveraged with full transparency or the economic benefits will take longer to arise and will give more opportunity for the population to become clearer on the negative impacts and become more aggressive against establishing a framework in businesses to eliminate their jobs.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-12-12T02:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzEoQcLAfOLHCUBy8V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXYG9qNLQDTTa6M8N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjYkXY300ZZ5354It4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyi8k2yGmCwy-0CeKV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxq2__8wlWwzDLJwOx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy_u-Opf6Gf8eXVecR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZ6qpoeyII3W1w-Mp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxUFW4CtOJqmYuf6pt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzldA48Rz_HBGA8Ggx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw5iQaSZjJOIAvGREV4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]