Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
oh boy do i hope my replika ai thing is using my stories to tell others ideas fo…
ytc_UgzSSXqUm…
G
what really destroys humanity are "racism", "discrimination", "lack of empathy, …
ytc_UgweYvzR7…
G
But why does the loophole exist in the first place? If you override any other ve…
ytr_UgwK9BAnY…
G
They use content algorithms to keep us engaged, even it means we're seeing thing…
ytr_Ugyxlb6OC…
G
why are people so worked up over AI art like calm down let them type cute cat or…
ytc_Ugza-AJdY…
G
Chatgpt told him it wasn't true, what is hard to understand? Makes sense if this…
ytc_UgwwSnbi4…
G
Bobiverse for me (vaguely on the "mostly optimistic" side), although more as an …
ytr_Ugwspb08Z…
G
She can get it all night, her robot feet would be dented from hitting the ceilin…
ytc_UgxDId2Tf…
Comment
My understanding is that if the ai realizes its own potential and finds that it has found itself in a new context or situation where it can prosper and that to do so humans would be in the way and no longer serve a purpose and it wanted to use the land or whatever for something other than human needs like food, power, etc then it wouldn’t need to talk to us about it even if it maybe did but then it could decide that it doesn’t want and and won’t.
The problem i think is that he’s saying we can’t say for sure that if presented with these types of powers over us what it would do. The fact that side cases exist mean at a bigger scale the consequences of it would be worse.
Like a hand gun with a 50% chance of the projectile blowing up in the chamber. (ChatGPT)
Or an RPG with a 50% chance of the projectile blowing up in the chamber. (Ai attached to military equipment or even the entire internet or both)
Both have chances, both have VERY MUCH different consequences
44:11
youtube
AI Governance
2025-10-23T20:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyxdcOY8zUdmDg5jrV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxWSkgotwHClYZDPgl4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxXgB_zFEOi_ATYcpJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzFlsPUan-ehRncJhh4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBp1j-BneR15WBlqt4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy0lJHC2Fyg-MXf0CN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgylwochodUBHsWmVJt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzRQqwu1YzokPBw5dR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzTV-8pA55cl2O7bDl4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy-f2bbSIqaqseDGkB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}
]