Raw LLM Responses

I disagree with the plausibility of synthetic sentience for several reasons first I want to point out that atheist philosophy states that humans came about my sheer chance but sentience in robots must be created, this paradox means that life does not evolve but must have a creator. Now the main reason I dont believe in synthetic sentience is because the fundamental difference between the most advanced computers/AI (take ibm Watson for instance) and life is the soul aspect of life. The physical body is there and a free will in a way is also there but a soul is not. A soul is beyond human understanding and represents the spirit aspect of life. A soul is what causes us to have an essence we can be aware of ourselves without a soul but we cannot truly inhabit a body without one. Take nde's(near death experiences) for example. Even if religion was stripped entirely from those phenomena, the idea that our spirit or soul is tied to our body is incorrect our souls inhabit a body but survive the death of the physical body. Souls cannot be created even if the physical parts are all put together. We can see this because animals have a soul and are considered life, but computers that are more advanced do not have a soul and do not show any sign of being alive. A popular theory is that a synthetic being will only simulate sentience without truly being sentient in the first place. It will simulate pain and react as if it is in pain, only because it is programmed to simulate feelings but in reality has no feelings at all