Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Freaking market opportunity.
how about we build a community with rules. a templ…
rdc_oi3cbfo
G
i work in AI/machine learning professionally and still fully support human artis…
ytc_Ugzd17FH3…
G
Art has always been a trade-off between effort and results. Put more effort into…
ytc_UgzBQSXLk…
G
I think these AI doomers are quite over reaching with AI just destroying us outr…
ytc_Ugy64pKz9…
G
Yeah, the work amount argument is really solid. It's also not that easy to get a…
ytc_UgwyPIzB7…
G
@ In what way would you rather they speak to the public? I'm not sure what else…
ytr_Ugw47Ee_9…
G
asking for a friend: what would a .20c sheet of dot stickers do to a tesla robot…
ytc_Ugw3iO-Gi…
G
When people get unemployed by these self driving trucks then they will loot thes…
ytc_UgzDga567…
Comment
I love how these comments are either extremely in favour or extremely against AI in coding. Hilarious.
The reality is it performs great in many programming tasks you ask it. Claude + cursor combo does wonders. But it's definitely not perfect at all. Especially given in the hands of junior devs, I think it's a bit dangerous. Models tend to hallucinate and sometimes loop infinitely over a question. It also changes unneccessary pieces of codes. Sometimes it doesn't clearly understand a prompt, or only partly does the job and you need to point it out what it did wrong, despite the fact there is a clear input and output example. It remains token prediction, so there will always be a piece of randomness unfortunately.
But in all fairness, it does great it in a large majority of cases so far with minimal reprompting. The quality of the prompting and properly contextualizing what you want plays a huge role as well.
youtube
2025-08-07T23:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwOaYclmw6hzZ9aic54AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwImB_UQIWaT7aUieN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz5XKlvRBxYvjBbOKl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyf83Zqk0RZXi6jazR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzbDaqE3pquBYHMa7B4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxP7z-Nvn2yWQJ0lGN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxOkCaNsg8y2fhyyx94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwIuOVCDESs38qQz2R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxQmh8pi6kudxygF-Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxdw08m8QRVwcMB8dB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]