Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
We have to teach ethics to AI ,but who wants to kill itself 😂if it is same as hu…
ytc_UgwA7h73M…
G
AI is never smart enough to make the manager obsolete. If people need to be mana…
ytc_UgydvvHR7…
G
it's not that surprising really, just because the test isn't published doesn't m…
ytc_UgyTgaHip…
G
AI are less human than a lizard, even a "Lizard person" from across the galaxy. …
ytc_UgxO5JXPd…
G
The possibility that AI becomes a guiding hand across centuries of human growth …
ytc_Ugyx1g7Ka…
G
Remember Apollo 11, the first successful manned mission to the moon? The single …
ytc_Ugzbk_oCg…
G
Looks like some of y’all out there are going to have to drop the attitudes or be…
ytc_UgwS2MY7_…
G
I'm not creative enough to come up with these kinds of role playing prompts. Can…
ytc_UgzMY5rnf…
Comment
Hey at around 11 minutes you start to talk about "reasoning models" and how AI has "thoughts" - my understanding is that this is actually a huge misnomer, these AIs do NOT use these thoughts at all to generate the text (and chat gpt seems to agree with this when you ask) - these chain of thought bubbles are actually used 1. as a diagnostic tool by LLM researchers to try to understand the text generation of the AI and 2. To give you something to read while it figures out what needs to be generated. The "chain of thought" bubbles have been shown in some models to have completely made up daydream reasoning while making errors in the thought that show that the "thought" was never used in the actual answer generation. I have seen it called "chain of thought drift" or "decoupled chain of thought" where the model is just throwing some text at the chain of thought because you want it to.
Not saying that no models consult their own chain of thought to generate an answer but at least cgpt self indicates that it does not.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-10-31T01:0…
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxcH58RRZU1U15_cQ14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwZDBpQXi5RhcM4Zjt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyB-j9zxdB8jMz3cS94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugymdsy0iFBh4TdLQwh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwfGyKf3hyd9KY8Y414AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfbgBu_DyFNx-Qkrh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgylAF-k1dwxc4iM3xd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwyCl8PYJoE4ZrkwSJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxPAlFOZf5P9-yFXq14AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx2DZPPy0JmWnTf_XF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]