Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Sorry guys, if youre physically or mentally disabled at all — you can't make art…
ytc_UgwUNjb1v…
G
AI is giving you lots of knowledge but making you to stupid to understand. All d…
ytc_UgzTDhIx-…
G
This is so immature. There’s a lot of money that goes into trying to help ai, an…
ytc_UgygXwznm…
G
Might as well sue the gun company, too, right? His suicidal mind is his own issu…
ytc_UgzFzDJNe…
G
Ok but like, who is teaching chatgpt morality and ethics? When ai starts to beco…
ytc_UgynCP0SH…
G
Who needs plebeians? The ultra wealthy owners of production will just have their…
ytc_Ugwg5U2y_…
G
Not possible, robot have fixed movements, and cant track this man to shot him wh…
ytc_Ugy4JcFeD…
G
Every time I try to load Chatgpt 3.5 it takes me to #4 any ideas are appreciated…
ytc_UgwDkUmo9…
Comment
11:36 Maximizing profit isn’t necessarily bad. In fact, it can drive innovation and capability-building. When companies or nations push boundaries for profit, they explore the full range of possibilities — including how certain technologies can be used or misused.
By seeing the full extent of what an AI system can do — including potentially dangerous or offensive capabilities — we gain the knowledge necessary to defend against those threats. If you prematurely restrict development simply because it’s driven by profit, you may leave yourself blind to the very threats someone else (who doesn’t follow your rules) might eventually create.
In other words:
Limiting development for fear of misuse may end up weakening our ability to prepare for misuse.
So, let the major players develop these capabilities — the knowledge they gain may one day be exactly what we need to defend ourselves.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-06-16T17:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzZwCl3LXrnEpFKRCB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwS_XWKmFE6gErcq7x4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxxTqtjKz1xpJhIFAt4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyZmT28Cr9mlMp4yMh4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwCaGMZSgronq0J6554AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwxUVYK0yAtZ-nbKJN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwRjeocc7BaTn92Mm94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxNeCwnJqJTK5zX86t4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzGChNASK-xinv1qll4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgykKxniTziqrJL7twV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]