Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Sheesh these "pro-ai artist" are just delusional yahoos who'll guilt trip you in…
ytc_UgwRKehY0…
G
That is the reason they plan to kills most human on this world in 2019. They the…
ytc_UgwtdmJ5D…
G
This actually made me feel better about the whole ai art thing ngl. I’ve been ki…
ytc_UgxAa1xup…
G
Not personally against AI art myself. I'm even thinking of incorporating it into…
ytc_UgzTRagB_…
G
Who remembers when russia said they built a functional robot but it ended up bei…
ytc_UgxANng8U…
G
Rights for robots should be something that is developed over time only if a robo…
ytc_UgijNLd-v…
G
Yes but the people behind are the enemy of truth and honesty and respect for oth…
ytc_Ugwhvmsz6…
G
"I don't see one image let alone billions of imagery and instantly like, you kno…
ytc_UgxshCyB-…
Comment
1:16:20 Counterpoint to the "Majority AI View" article: The engineers, PMs, etc who are tasked with taking LLMs from the lab to the market are not equipped to understand the technology. It's a very different beast. I work with a ton of highly competent engineers at one of the big AI companies with large conventional tech branches and the paucity of calculus or linear algebra knowledge alone creates such a barrier for them to deeply grapple with it. They fall back to reasoning about it with analogy to tools they're familiar with, like search, autocomplete, etc. The result is a pretty myopic bias toward assuming it will be like previous technologies.
I do think the alchemy analogy is accurate, but if anyone is the scientist in the room it's the people working on interpretability. The "tech people" who are working on deploying or fine tuning are not the experts whose opinions matter. They might be better informed than the general public, but it's marginal.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-10-31T09:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwGCenfic0DffQynGV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxMwUrLPPKGZc7N7gZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYTqk0c1AMEO-Cn0R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzvezki_UIzKiot7-R4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwqT_qp2eypDr9Kwf14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyYZAS6C1uYHlECl894AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyJjyR6omrJ_AWUSwR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTHp--dd6C17hBoY14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyv3k5O2BLJBDFPWJN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz1YYOzpzTlkFa9XrV4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]