Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Economy? It will be a war or revolution. If the rich sits on all assets without …
ytc_UgxlLQ8Ch…
G
I don’t know there’s lots of accidents involving Teslas on auto pilot. My robot …
ytc_UgycS9oa_…
G
I've been saying please and thank you to any Ai I interact with for years now! F…
ytc_Ugwkg8-SA…
G
I find it extraordinary that with no word China has more presence in that discus…
ytc_UgwVOwCyA…
G
AI should not get better. You think this is giving us hope but everyone is actua…
ytr_Ugz2ZNrsh…
G
It'd be sick if they set up an environment similar to the handler cheating on hi…
ytc_UgxUUNMwC…
G
We could easily use this method with REAL teachers also.,.. just 2-3 hrs a day…
ytc_UgwgGoIlt…
G
really an AI artist is more of a commissioner
except they are too cheap to commi…
ytc_UgzoBP3Ho…
Comment
1:16:20 Counterpoint to the "Majority AI View" article: The engineers, PMs, etc who are tasked with taking LLMs from the lab to the market are not equipped to understand the technology. It's a very different beast. I work with a ton of highly competent engineers at one of the big AI companies with large conventional tech branches and the paucity of calculus or linear algebra knowledge alone creates such a barrier for them to deeply grapple with it. They fall back to reasoning about it with analogy to tools they're familiar with, like search, autocomplete, etc. The result is a pretty myopic bias toward assuming it will be like previous technologies.
I do think the alchemy analogy is accurate, but if anyone is the scientist in the room it's the people working on interpretability. The "tech people" who are working on deploying or fine tuning are not the experts whose opinions matter. They might be better informed than the general public, but it's marginal.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-10-31T09:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwGCenfic0DffQynGV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxMwUrLPPKGZc7N7gZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYTqk0c1AMEO-Cn0R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzvezki_UIzKiot7-R4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwqT_qp2eypDr9Kwf14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyYZAS6C1uYHlECl894AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyJjyR6omrJ_AWUSwR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTHp--dd6C17hBoY14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyv3k5O2BLJBDFPWJN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz1YYOzpzTlkFa9XrV4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]