Raw LLM Responses

Technically they are in their full right to trace AI art since AI art cannot be copyrighted or owned or whatever. If you do not believe me, search it up. The only parts of an ai art that can be owned art parts that were drawn by an actual person. And since you can’t, well, only in some rare instances, trace the images that make up an ai artwork back to the original artists works that made up the ai artwork (not sure if that made sense). You would never know. So this person who traced the AI, that art is legally theirs actually. They should have said they traced at least though instead of lying. May be a controversial opinion, but personally, I don’t have a problem with this. AI art is ridiculous. It can put real artists out of their job, which is really sad. I personally am an artist. I don’t touch AI art, because I don’t want to support it. I also don’t trace because I don’t want to get accused of it like this person did. That stuff worries me though. But what I mean is that this ai art is getting so advanced you can say stuff like, “a pretty girl in a sitting post in [an artists style]” and it will draw it in that artist’s style. Which means if that artist has commissions, people could just ask ai art and they wouldn’t get as many commissions. Which of course can lower their earnings. That’s just an example though.