Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
There is nothing humane about AI at this time without laws that govern it, to no…
ytc_Ugw9Hq78s…
G
Its sad that A.I. stuff is going to destroy art. Shitty companies will make sure…
ytc_UgwHmyRvI…
G
Aaron, and why is that Venezuelan woman so poor that she has to live that way? …
ytc_UgwcBhZmm…
G
Progress should be technology at the benefit of everyone which is the exact oppo…
rdc_kziw73c
G
CLAUDE model is incredibly accurate on generating correct code 50% you need to d…
ytc_UgzwF0md3…
G
AI cannot replicate the nuance of the human experience.I will forever stand by t…
ytc_UgyzMN8ZV…
G
Everything AI can could be done by humans. And in a much better and more creativ…
ytc_UgxvBVCQ3…
G
As soon as you enter a freeway it is no longer using the v12 neural net. I thin…
ytc_UgytiQgjf…
Comment
The way it works it wouldn't really be able to credit. Maybe if you input someone specific style the person posting can add credits. It also costs money since it is very resource intensive. You can run it on your own PC if you have a beefy enough GPU. Sites and apps that sell the service of AI art generation are running on a lot better and very expensive hardware.
So, selling the service of generation is not necessarily a bad thing, but selling generation of their specifically trained model that is based on stolen work is pretty stupid. Even NovelAI stole code from Automatic1111 and claimed he stole their code. Caused a big drama in the SD community.
Personally, i think a company should train an AI based royalty free images and paying artist to provide images specifically for training. It would cost a lot to artist to provide many images to make their model better. Then they can sell that service to generate non stolen art generations to businesses to generate art for their commercial uses.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2022-12-31T02:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgwEIFAaYd5ANttHhZ94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz54lOkzAI0StqjJrR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyoCaVCx0mp16IL9st4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxNzKYv1I5NRVub-yl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwimMxSyQZuan09CJh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWVfuJd0GU3KA0xWl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxLIcLyg4kXcqBZJTl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyYTVxa8xISzK9HUWF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZNtlQ66pGlVySygN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyksHqF_eXFGqqwIDF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}]