Raw LLM Responses

See, I as an artist and slightly connected to the programming understand that the AI is here to stay and can be the fruit of great achievements and evolution of humanity, but it depends on us and only us because like any technology, can be used for the "good" and for the "evil" of others. And for more aesthetic and accessible that new technologies have presented themselves, they have gross flaws concerning their ethics and moral functioning, from social ethics to environmental ethics can still be considered destructive or at least hasty. Remember that only 31% of the world has access to basic education, remember that around 17 million people survive today only with artistic earnings and many of them, mainly in underdeveloped countries, depend on these earnings to eat and have access to basic health, remember that psychologically the human being is not prepared to see this technology as an auxiliary factor but as a factor of substitution of what already exists. Artists protesting, often they are not protesting simply because they don't like the technology or because of any legislative convention/agenda, but because they fear that tomorrow they won't be able to put any more food on the table. Talking now about the book The War of Art, don't you think that art being a way of liberating the soul in its process, due to the requirements of patience and other virtues, the conduct of this process being passed on to an AI would not be a tool of resistance? If imagination is something that is born from the ability to see something more and resistance holds you where you are, when you have not enjoyed your creative capacity would it actually be the resistance of wanting to imagine? Just things to think about...