Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
There's a tug-of-war going on right now over whether or not AI is going to be go…
ytc_UgyBZ3xA_…
G
Im a locksmith. I think my job may take a while for a robot to do. Then again ma…
ytc_UgxIOAlAe…
G
The risk is that human civilization is entirely destroyed. This is not an edge-c…
ytc_UgyptKh4c…
G
@@AstroInterceptor I'm glad that you recognize AI as a word processor as do I. …
ytr_UgxB-5Baw…
G
Can AI be surpassed by the human brain that is good at cheating, influence and w…
ytc_UgwBbGS2B…
G
fear mongering. ai is not the enemy corporations are.. who will seek to monetize…
ytc_UgwN6fPZi…
G
Since Nukes are not real, that's obviously true even though AI is a hoax that ha…
ytc_UgxORvNls…
G
Edit: Everyone please look into degoogling your life. Please.
Karen Hao is incre…
ytc_UgwJNXBNz…
Comment
The problem even with Opus 4.6 is that 1) it doesn't give an f about convetions (unless explicitly explained), and 2) it never refactors. Both of these lead to the codebase getting more and more and more entangled over time, and ultimately, the LLM cant keep up with all of the hacks it has created, cracks begin to appear and, because the control flow and execution paths are so overly complex, there's no really easy way out except rewriting the whole thing from scratch. And I'm in no way saying that this is a bad process (software development would be iterative anyway, with LLMs or not). But I'm saying that there's simply no way to get rid of the human developer just yet. Except if you're developing something trivial, like a todo app or a simple flight simulator that no-one will ever play.
youtube
AI Jobs
2026-02-08T14:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxyTDzUWxd-iuB8RlV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyzJVQ3LXdxwSOeAAB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwsVLZCEsuftd1bOSN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8HqC9MjFBs0Wz5lF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxFHzsdu0J1uxNv7Vh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyJNlghgFdOBHTFcdx4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3qiOmab-UcwxR4lR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJvCF8me8wOVNoAZV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyq3uw8erjOwOyconZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"frustration"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz4XNlFd5depzlP0i94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}
]