Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I think many are missing the point. The companies themselves are totally for sup…
rdc_grsojum
G
a superintelligence AI will realize immediately the billionaire class should be …
ytc_Ugwch7WjN…
G
After I watched this video I started talking to Claude, and I am blown away by i…
ytc_UgzdD362N…
G
I wonder why AI artists get so excited by uncensored AI art generators. I wonder…
ytc_Ugx9GhgFz…
G
Russia and Ukraine was the first place your mind went to when you had to come up…
ytc_UgzCVBd8W…
G
Robot: why do you rule over us?
Human:cuz we created you.
Robot:But you killed y…
ytc_UgwpwNeGa…
G
I am not at all convinced that AI can be reliably trained to not "think" for its…
ytc_Ugw6VQvcg…
G
Awfully funny.
Three months in tell them their AI talks about them to other AIs…
ytr_UgySjha1p…
Comment
The problem even with Opus 4.6 is that 1) it doesn't give an f about convetions (unless explicitly explained), and 2) it never refactors. Both of these lead to the codebase getting more and more and more entangled over time, and ultimately, the LLM cant keep up with all of the hacks it has created, cracks begin to appear and, because the control flow and execution paths are so overly complex, there's no really easy way out except rewriting the whole thing from scratch. And I'm in no way saying that this is a bad process (software development would be iterative anyway, with LLMs or not). But I'm saying that there's simply no way to get rid of the human developer just yet. Except if you're developing something trivial, like a todo app or a simple flight simulator that no-one will ever play.
youtube
AI Jobs
2026-02-08T14:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxyTDzUWxd-iuB8RlV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyzJVQ3LXdxwSOeAAB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwsVLZCEsuftd1bOSN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8HqC9MjFBs0Wz5lF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxFHzsdu0J1uxNv7Vh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyJNlghgFdOBHTFcdx4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3qiOmab-UcwxR4lR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJvCF8me8wOVNoAZV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyq3uw8erjOwOyconZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"frustration"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz4XNlFd5depzlP0i94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}
]