Raw LLM Responses

I have this economical Ai theory: I think there needs to be a restructuring of company and tax laws in the us that incentivizes companies to invest their income into community projects to reduce tax and gain public favoritbility but in the same time still pay more, it's like PR, but instead of words it's facilities or services for the public. And public should be able to benefit from said ai, by say a share sallary system, where instead of the company buying and putting the machine to work by themselves, Ai is regulated as well as machines so that the public can invest into providing capital for those machines via a big government Index fund style account, where the company will have to pay either that machine a portion of what a regular worker would cost, towards the sallary fund, or have a percentage of their revenue be redirected back into the fund as a form of investment sallary instead of stock since stocks goes up and down in value, but sallary either stays constant or is based on profits and losses. This way it's like every american is buying an ai machine to work for them and the fund is basically a collective of AI and machines that the companies pay to make profits cheaper than hiring humans but the profits also is allocated to the fund investors. This fund investing must have a cap to prevent single citizens overinvesting, one that is part of the government and is more stable, and many other free market ones as well. The government one is capped at a point where the monthly sallary is say higher than 10x the regular annual wage. This way there will always be room for people to invest with good sallary value. Or it can taper down in profit percentage once you reach a certain amount of shares, like a tax almost, that way one can keep reinvesting and helping the portfolio grow, providing more capital to be invested and bring more nett sallary value to the first time sallary share buyers. If this system of law is implemented AI and machines can make American only need to work maybe a decade of two ideally and retire from the sallary fund they've invested in since the machine and ai literally work for them and get paid. so it's not like a stock where it can have a loss month, as it's again sallary. and companies who fail, simply fire the machine or Ai but does not decrease value like ai, it's a halt not a dip. Thoughts? Also this sytem can work in both republican and democratic economic methods of small vs big government, either the gov controls the big monopolies that pay for these machinese making sure to pump as much value to citizens whilst rewarding the billionaires with public applaud for lifting their sallary, or break the monopolies by implementing a variety of tax brackets for smaller companies, and thus create competition between smaller companies and make big companies harder to have much profit for the ceo's if the company doesn't actually bring much value. In essense we merge the investor class with the people so the incentive of the ceo is to make the people richer, by making effecient ai and machines that work for the investors/people making everyone rich.