Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The idealist in me hopes for the “Boomer” future of AI. But, the realist in me k…
ytc_UgyhGcSR_…
G
I support OpenAI helping the US military!!!
We need to keep pace with our enemi…
ytc_UgwSG3s0F…
G
It is the use and interactions with ai that aligns it.
Without human connection …
ytc_UgydnImlY…
G
@Bellawstwood ?? And people used to think video games were much more dangerous t…
ytr_Ugzrv-vB9…
G
@101stub The point was that the difference between almost fully and fully autono…
ytr_Ugy3QOWo5…
G
This is not surprising. The ultra rich don't care about everyday people at all…
ytc_UgxXzs94X…
G
How did they commit murder when the ChatGPT generates info from the internet its…
ytr_UgxeH-S52…
G
we need a law for this now because if we do this when they will be ai they will …
ytc_Ugg9RewNi…
Comment
From a personal standpoint, based on their record of the habitual abuse towards people of color, I don’t think law enforcement should have the tech at all. Period. Meanwhile, from a rational plane, if the application of facial recognition is being used as an aid to help form a conclusion to a case that is actively open, that seems feasible. Someone who resembles a suspect in an open investigation where facial recognition is used to help confirm a likely match and then that person is authenticated by human confirmation, that seems acceptable. The tech, in that case, is being used to aid in the confirmation of a suspect with specified margins for error, NOT being used as a defining or closing factor of the case, as there are such things as false positives and some people can starkly resemble someone else. Alternatively, using the tech in a public application where you are scanning several tens of people passing a public camera and identifying them in an attempt to, ”stop crime before it happens,” that's definitely a NO and I can't agree with from any angle.
youtube
2020-07-13T01:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | government |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyZ9C53NF_YkJi1tO54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxHjk06bui6RfhGpGh4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw6tRWQL6g3VSgmOuB4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxG77LM5g4CR6x2ZyR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzz9uGZMu5nyG3LXlF4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwhsXQof2RwWtdT8Dt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxrPTPYZvh-VAuW9Y54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxzMw_MJVCf6ddfMgd4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy9QZN67EHuBRklaHJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy2uPFIzqVNiRbKO3F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}
]