Raw LLM Responses

"Some" cases, not all This is not something you can take an absolutist stance on, otherwise it bleeds into everything that in inspired by past work (most modern games are still built off of late 90s to early 2000s principles for example; movies even more so from further back). So where do you draw the line? We have passed laws in the US to control music, but it only applies to a few notes in a row and short melodies, but it does not extend very far and it simply cannot extend far without compromising creativity. Not only that, but artists who draw, are mostly using the same styles now days and have been for 15~ years. Are they all stealing from each other despite it all looking about the same? No, but it just mean they wont make money. Same with AI; MOST of the AI stuff will remain similar to something, and the extreme few (as it has always been) will seek out and purchase the art from the truly talented, because it is niche. Nothing new under the sun. The minority of jobs will be affected, and not crucial ones. At the end of the day, it is all going to be incorporated into your day to day life, so you can either accept it and make something positive with that reality, or you can stand on a principle that doesn't really matter at the end of the day. If the industrial revolution didn't end society, then this surely wont lol