Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
AI will realise nations are a human construction and that the only way to grow i…
ytc_UgxAmfkPl…
G
Why do kitchen and bathroom remodeling. Controled demolition of lath and plaster…
ytc_Ugwuv_H7k…
G
Can AI remove the insufferable vocal fry from this guys voice. If I had that muc…
ytc_Ugyl3vV2t…
G
There is a thing, because autonomous cars do not solve the problems that cars ha…
ytc_Ugy1mETx8…
G
Every single word said so beautifully here. I will be sharing your video wheneve…
ytc_Ugy9jb_ly…
G
I don't think deepfaking should be legal in any capacity, it provides nothing of…
ytc_UgyrJkHEI…
G
2:29 you actually can. It would just take a *lot* more effort than it does for a…
ytc_Ugzsi0g0U…
G
Use imagen 4 ultra in Google AI Studio
Type "make a character in the style of th…
ytr_Ugy-AAo8L…
Comment
This is a very sensitive subject, or will be. I just don't want this to turn into more division in the country. I agree Ai needs to be taxed, LLM's should be taxed one for one (maybe 1 for every 3 workers they displace) with the workers they displace. Same thing for humanoid robots, 1 for 1 or at least 1 for 3. We also need to make it a law that if you have 1 humanoid robot you need to employ 1 human, or at least have a human supervisor over every, say, 3 robots. At least for a while so the transition doesn't get too chaotic. We do need to see the benefits here though, healthcare should be the biggest winner here. Good inexpensive robots will help home health for the elderly and people with special needs. Here is the last idea and maybe part of the answer here, what if humanoid robots were not taxed per individual. That way I could bring my robot to work and have it do the heavy lifting for me (literally). I would stay relevant regardless of what industry i was in. I hope we can debate and figure this out peacefully.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-10-12T13:3…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzIYZgi72JYo-MH0694AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxGs9GVjEOyA7SyrQ94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgydaVrQESOakVxy46h4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwMgiswNXYV65cMbnN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgztlX07PkpWJgm1HsN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy1nYJrVJhXs2CdTpR4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwoC2XBgSP0GFej4sh4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxCU-lfEsTJ9FO-uHh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzaP3jy-0YSxn9czIF4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxG7qegxqvsCznJPhR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}
]