Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G I'd rather buy ugly or childish artworks from artists who put hours and efforts … ytc_Ugxl3M-6C… G Sounds good but does it mean nothing. And if this adage was learned in Silicin v… ytc_UgysfFoSI… G i had this conversation with Luma my chatgpt. it told me the exact same thing … ytc_UgzIo2Slc… G the way Aliagents integrates AI with tokenization is changing the game, excited … ytc_Ugym9PBQ9… G Why would AI, which cannot physically move objects, suddenly put minimum job emp… ytc_UgyFrhE_6… G I think there is little to no problem with AI, but people. It would be as bad if… ytc_UgyV6BRpO… G @disorderandregression9278 the difference between that and ai is it takes money,… ytr_UgwBxQCSx… G If this is not AI I might just do it to myself before these do it… ytc_Ugyeldz_2…
Comment
I've been trying to educate people how to handle this. AI taking jobs isn't a problem, it's the future. But here's how humans can still make money without ridiculous taxes or unsustainable systems like UBI. To learn more, ask ChatGPT "Please explain how a distributed ownership model for fully automated factories can act as a form of UBI without costing the government money, while still providing taxes to keep the government running. Also explain how this approach can provide affordable access to essential goods and services. Also explain how this approach can facilitate the transition from our current economy to a post-labor economy, where machines are doing the majority of economically meaningful work." Retraining programs are a dumb idea. Why? Because we are headed towards a future where most jobs are automated. Most people will be unemployed, not because they are lazy, but because there are no jobs available. All retraining will do is keep people in school until the job they are retraining for becomes automated. Sure, some new jobs will be created, but not enough for most to have one.
youtube AI Jobs 2026-01-01T01:1…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policyindustry_self
Emotionapproval
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgxGWuhQ9ULz5ZJ-tHd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwwI5BX2urj3ohVc654AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyzW6JbUinYq2DY5WJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyPM15BcfeLQkfPDWZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgydEoZNhqyrqaMbweZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzlgkGskR-w2Igsy1h4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyyaUZlP3IVOTsUBlB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyNiRsEYKF8TJg8pct4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxGWxmdgzz0kNaLv1N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzkiBzD5-GsxdwvcXx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"} ]