Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Video evidence may become near worthless if we are not careful, honestly if some… ytc_UgyQgZfSx… G if lidars are so good why has luminar gone out of business and Waymo still drivi… ytc_UgyY3XEby… G So ein Blödsinn, die K I ist ein Programm das nur das macht wozu es programmiert… ytr_UgzlhBtke… G I recently was testing out Claude Sonnet 4, operating under the assumption that … rdc_mxgoh33 G ​@Nde-g1s u can also create a good prompt by telling other ai to make the descri… ytr_UgztP7jD5… G it's inevitable, but i do not condone it. just like how automation threatens exi… ytc_UgwLbTD5l… G I think the assumption that jobs being completely replaced by AI is completely o… ytc_UgyP_YZmS… G now ai will always remerber in his data base that we wanted to kill him becasue … ytc_UgyDDYbLo…
Comment
Not super convinced by this logic. Firstly, we often use non-literal language for communication without it being 'lying', as the AI does. For example, if a person said "it's raining cats and dogs" it would be unfair to say "so there must literally be animals coming down outside according to what you say or you are lying to me". Thus it may be using "I'm excited/sorry' as just a non literal phrase used for communication, as it explains. Secondly, what's the point in saying "you could be lying about being conscious and we wouldn't know" and suggesting it as proof that it may be conscious? All it says is that if the AI was conscious and could lie, we couldn't ask it and expect the truth. Surely this is a given. If a human says "I didn't steal", then all we can say is that they could be always telling the truth about not stealing or could be lying and did steal. It says nothing about whether they actually did steal or not, as with the AI being conscious or not.
youtube AI Moral Status 2024-08-03T00:0…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningmixed
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgxBW02Sn5qRhXIoS_h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzzB4bKurnWZ3gAPPB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx3lJNcyo6YnRU7mfd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxRbTPJ2HQ2S7goG8B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxV5yeEta0uxKjkigd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx1Nts7INQF2AJUnT94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzB5GZ-KeR3sbRhhUF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugw-_ZQmLRWoG_E55kh4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwrkwgvLXQJA_Er1-V4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyJLW3J18WbJYWGPc54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"} ]