Raw LLM Responses

The dangers are in the state, not the use of AI. Without the state you have choice. With the state you have no choice. I can choose not to use a computer at all, let alone just not use facebook, but I can't choose whether or not to use a computer if the state mandates I file my taxes via computer. Yes- states mandate the use of technology and technology I find morally objectionable (obligating me to licenses I don't agree with, aka Microsoft Windows End User License agreements for instance). Without the state I can choose not to use Microsoft Windows and I can choose not to use a computer. It's the state that is the real danger. I don't need regulations to to manage my life or survive. We survived thousands of years without any of these regulations and there is no reasons man kind can't survive another 1000 years without them, but what is certain is we're endangering ourselves through regulating economic efficiency into non-existence and undermining regional economical survivals. Europe is a failed state because of it and we've already seen many nations within fail. It's just a matter of time before socialism collapse it. Neither socialism nor crony capitalism is the answer. The answer is to stop fearmongering and end the state as we know it. Return to a minimalist government and leave people to do what they do best. End copyright and patents and the artificial creations that stop real competition. Let technology solve the safety issue- to whatever degree people want to be safer. Safety is a selling point. If enough people get sick let a rating system put an end to that business, not some exploitative government bureaucrat. Same goes for military, law enforcement, and education. All of these things could be and in some places are opt-in and privatized and in part left to competitive forces.