Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G There is a difference between robot and slave - robots would be very expensive (… ytc_Ugit6t1Gk… G plus, it's so fun to look at the different styles and compare them. AI typically… ytc_UgxOpfSIg… G Both it's goals and it's power come from men. Also, there's 300 different types … ytr_Ugz_1Il2r… G I view AI as an extension of the brain. The atrophy comes from a desire to live… ytc_UgwoiWQpV… G People need to stop with this hope for UBI to solve a very large unemployment ra… rdc_j44l2vu G The evolution of robots. Will there be someday a real ‘Asto boy, Gigantor, 8th m… ytc_UgzTSRyEZ… G Easy for highway robbers to ambush and trap in a driverless semitruxk and steal … ytc_UgzWvAcLu… G If someone is leaving OpenAI for AI safety, government surveillance, or willingn… rdc_o7wxhm0

Comment

Can AI be used by others for nefarious purposes, absolutely. But as for AI becoming dangerous or having it's own motivations, absolutely not. He describes himself as a 'materialist'. In other words he believes intelligence and consciousness is simply an emergent property of a complex system. I don't believe that at all, and there is the distinction. That is why I believe (along with those that think like me) that AI will only ever be able to mimic consciousness and sentience, it won't actually possess it. What's the difference? Well I suppose the difference will be less relevant as time goes on and it becomes better and better at synthesizing true consciousness, but the point is AI systems will always need direction, they cannot 'think' for themselves, they are not and will not ever be 'alive', they are simply algorithms and will always be algorithms. I suppose it boils down to a philosophical argument. But this guy speaks a bit like Richard Dawkins, he's a very materialist 'scientific' thinker. You just don't get the full picture from people that think that way.

youtube AI Governance 2025-06-18T10:5…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgxAO_IOCVQbhMk9u-h4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxABc89wKbgMpL749R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOIzl7JK7i_rKNpsV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzmV2aSnT-b56-y4Vp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw9pPkyRYE8ZydFldx4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_xR9HrcZOASvOEAJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTgVeDUcviOfuVPq14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyaF67rd2yp5Rkv3-F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzgH5TaGiHsTH7E53d4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_zz4W7muLyeBReKR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]

Raw LLM Responses