Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I'm not really a fan of government telling us what we can and cannot do but at t…
ytc_UgwyCMzRb…
G
Yes, because ai doesn’t have morality. All it sees is that one race commits much…
ytr_UgzDbfQuR…
G
I was laughed at decades ago when I would speak about this. I have been preparin…
ytc_UgyOqj5rp…
G
It's weird my ex Melissa had that exact voice. I almost felt like they spied on …
ytc_UgzqSYslF…
G
I had a thoght about a.i being sentient,that how could a robot have human like e…
ytc_Ugzwaebe2…
G
Ai scares the hell out of me. Technology has evolved so fast in 20 yrs. Ai is da…
ytc_UgyjUTslH…
G
Billionaires seem to own the AI revolution and appear to be directing it to take…
ytc_UgwuF7Aac…
G
There you go guys. Using AI has created your dependency on it. Next you'll be t…
ytr_UgwPBjMPU…
Comment
Can AI be used by others for nefarious purposes, absolutely. But as for AI becoming dangerous or having it's own motivations, absolutely not. He describes himself as a 'materialist'. In other words he believes intelligence and consciousness is simply an emergent property of a complex system. I don't believe that at all, and there is the distinction. That is why I believe (along with those that think like me) that AI will only ever be able to mimic consciousness and sentience, it won't actually possess it.
What's the difference? Well I suppose the difference will be less relevant as time goes on and it becomes better and better at synthesizing true consciousness, but the point is AI systems will always need direction, they cannot 'think' for themselves, they are not and will not ever be 'alive', they are simply algorithms and will always be algorithms.
I suppose it boils down to a philosophical argument. But this guy speaks a bit like Richard Dawkins, he's a very materialist 'scientific' thinker. You just don't get the full picture from people that think that way.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-06-18T10:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxAO_IOCVQbhMk9u-h4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxABc89wKbgMpL749R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOIzl7JK7i_rKNpsV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzmV2aSnT-b56-y4Vp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw9pPkyRYE8ZydFldx4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_xR9HrcZOASvOEAJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTgVeDUcviOfuVPq14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyaF67rd2yp5Rkv3-F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzgH5TaGiHsTH7E53d4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_zz4W7muLyeBReKR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]